Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration via Quantum Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cryptographic systems, such as RSA and Diffie-Hellman, are vulnerable to quantum computers, which can potentially break modern public-key encryption using algorithms like Shor's and Grover's, necessitating a migration to quantum-resistant algorithms to protect sensitive data from future quantum computing threats.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) systems that utilize techniques like hash-based, lattice-based, isogeny-based, code-based, and zero-knowledge proof cryptography to secure data, including generating encrypted data, monitoring data environments for quantum computing techniques, and re-encrypting data based on detected quantum threats, ensuring resistance to quantum attacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If quantum computing capabilities are realized, then computational power and problem-solving ability are dramatically improved, but current cryptographic security protocols become vulnerable and compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational powerVSAvoidcryptographic security
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing quantum computing detection capabilities and threat assessment mechanisms before quantum computers can actually compromise cryptographic systems. The system proactively monitors for quantum computing threats, assesses vulnerability levels, and prepares migration strategies in advance, allowing organizations to transition to quantum-resistant cryptography before their current security protocols become vulnerable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If migration to quantum-resistant algorithms is implemented, then long-term data security is improved, but system complexity and migration effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term data securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by creating an adaptive cryptographic system that can dynamically adjust its security protocols based on detected quantum computing threats. The system transitions from static cryptographic implementations to dynamic ones that automatically respond to threat levels, enabling seamless migration to quantum-resistant algorithms while maintaining operational continuity and reducing the perceived complexity of the migration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring data environments for quantum computing techniques, assessing threat levels, and using this information to guide migration decisions. The feedback loop provides real-time information about quantum computing capabilities and threats, allowing the system to adjust its cryptographic protocols and migration strategy based on actual conditions rather than theoretical predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If quantum computing detection and monitoring is implemented, then threat detection capability is improved, but computational resources and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing selective monitoring strategies that focus computational resources on detecting specific quantum computing techniques and threat patterns rather than attempting to monitor all possible quantum activities. The system performs threat assessments at appropriate levels of detail based on the specific context and risk level, avoiding unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining effective detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11736281B1Systems and methods for post-quantum cryptography optimization
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US11736281B1 patent drawing
  • US11736281B1 patent drawing
  • US11736281B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for post-quantum cryptography (PQC). An example method includes generating encrypted data. The example method further includes monitoring a set of data environments comprising the encrypted data, wherein a data environment associated with the set of data environments comprises one or more quantum computing techniques. The example method further includes generating quantum computing (QC) detection data comprising one or more instances of the one or more quantum computing techniques decrypting the encrypted data. The example method further includes, subsequent to the generation of the QC detection data, encrypting data based on the QC detection data, wherein the data is encrypted based on a set of PQC encryption attributes absent from the QC detection data.