Selective Post-Shock Pacing via VF Quality Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) often result in delayed administration of defibrillation shocks, leading to low survival rates due to the inefficacy of conventional post-shock treatments, particularly in patients without Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs), where external pacing may not be effective and CPR is not always the best approach.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods for selective post-shock pacing, which involve distinguishing patients receptive to pacing from those not receptive through VF quality analysis, allowing for tailored therapy post-shock, potentially improving blood flow and patient outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external pacing is administered to all VF patients post-shock, then some patients may benefit from improved blood flow, but many patients receive ineffective therapy wasting valuable treatment time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating treatment based on patient subgroups. It identifies specific VF characteristics (organized vs. disorganized electrical activity) to determine which patients will respond to pacing versus those who need immediate CPR, rather than applying a uniform treatment protocol to all patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of VF quality assessment from a binary shockable/non-shockable classification to a nuanced evaluation of electrical organization. By analyzing the degree of electrical organization in VF, the system dynamically adjusts the post-shock treatment approach (pacing versus CPR) based on the measured electrical characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If VF quality analysis is performed to distinguish pacing-receptive patients, then therapy can be optimized for individual patients, but the complexity of the defibrillation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy customizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the defibrillator to automatically analyze VF quality and select the appropriate post-shock treatment without requiring external medical judgment. The device performs electrogram analysis, determines electrical organization, and autonomously directs either pacing or CPR based on its assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback by continuously monitoring VF electrogram characteristics and using this information to guide treatment decisions. The system analyzes the electrical signals in real-time, provides feedback on VF organization quality, and adjusts the post-shock therapy accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10828501B2Selective post-shock transthoracic pacing
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 PHYSIO CONTROL CORP
  • US10828501B2 patent drawing
  • US10828501B2 patent drawing
  • US10828501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical device can include a housing, an energy storage module within the housing to store an electrical charge, and a defibrillation port to guide via electrodes the stored electrical charge to a person in need of medical assistance. The medical device can also include a processor to perform a patient signal analysis on an electrocardiogram (ECG) signal corresponding to the person and further determine, based on a result of the patient signal analysis, whether post-shock transcutaneous pacing should be performed on the person.