Digital Content Classification via Poster Frames and Keyword Panes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital content classification methods are inefficient for organizing and editing large collections of video, audio, and image files, as they lack a structured approach to categorize and sort content based on quality and context, making it difficult for users to quickly access and edit relevant items.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that displays digital content as poster frames in a user interface, allowing users to classify items using first and second-level classification panes associated with keywords, enabling grouping and editing of content based on metadata, with automatic generation of keywords for improved organization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users manually organize and classify large collections of digital content, then content can be categorized and sorted, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent classification efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for manual organization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates keywords and classifies content without requiring manual user input. The computer-implemented method extracts meaningful terms from content metadata and performs classification autonomously, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous user intervention for organization tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification by generating keywords and organizing content into categories before the user needs to access or edit the content. This advance organization ensures that when users do need to work with the content, it is already sorted and ready for efficient retrieval and editing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If a simple classification system is used, then the interface remains easy to use, but it lacks the structured approach needed for organizing large content collections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface simplicityVSAvoidclassification structure capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The classification system is divided into multiple levels, with first-level categories providing broad organization and second-level categories offering more specific classification. This segmented approach allows the interface to remain simple while providing the structured versatility needed for organizing large content collections, as users can work at whichever level is most appropriate for their current task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to classification by automatically generating keywords and organizing content based on metadata analysis. This creates an additional organizational layer beyond traditional manual categorization, enabling the system to handle complex content collections while maintaining interface simplicity through automated intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If multiple classification levels are implemented, then content organization becomes more detailed and accurate, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The classification system is designed to be dynamic rather than static. The computer-implemented method automatically generates keywords and adjusts classifications based on content analysis, allowing the system to adapt to different content types and user needs. This dynamic approach maintains high classification accuracy while managing system complexity through intelligent automation rather than rigid multi-level structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If automatic keyword generation is used, then content classification is improved, but reliance on metadata accuracy is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated classification speedVSAvoidclassification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where classification results can be reviewed and adjusted. The computer-implemented method generates keywords and classifications automatically, but the multi-level classification structure allows users to provide feedback by adjusting categories or adding corrections, which then refines future automatic classification accuracy while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8375312B2Classifying digital media based on content
Publication Date: 2013.02.12 APPLE INC
  • US8375312B2 patent drawing
  • US8375312B2 patent drawing
  • US8375312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for classifying digital content can include displaying one or more poster frames in a user interface, wherein a poster frame corresponds to an item of digital content, displaying one or more first level classification panes adjacent to a poster frame corresponding to an item to be classified, wherein a first level classification pane is associated with a keyword, and enabling a user to associate a poster frame with a first level classification pane to cause the keyword associated with the first level classification pane to be associated with the item to which the poster frame corresponds.