Posterior Prosthetic Spinal Disc with Articulating Units
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current prosthetic spinal discs are too bulky for safe posterior implantation, posing risks due to their size and inflexibility, and existing solutions fail to mimic the natural spinal disc's varying instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) and center of rotation (COR), leading to potential damage to facet joints and instability.
Innovation Solution
A posterior prosthetic spinal disc design featuring articulating or non-articulating units with flexible members, slider plates, and adjustable endplates that allow for customization of IAR and COR, enabling safe posterior implantation while maintaining stability and mimicking natural spinal motion.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Volume of moving object
If current prosthetic spinal disc design is used, then implantation can be performed, but the disc is too bulky for safe posterior implantation and poses risks due to size and inflexibility
Solution Approach 1:
The prosthetic disc is divided into multiple articulating units (e.g., two upper units and two lower units) that can move independently relative to each other. This segmentation allows the implant to be inserted through a narrower posterior approach while maintaining the necessary functional volume and providing flexibility to avoid spinal cord contact.
Solution Approach 2:
The prosthetic disc incorporates dynamic articulating units with slider plates and flexible members that allow motion and adjustment. This dynamic design enables the disc to adapt its configuration during insertion and operation, reducing bulk during posterior implantation while maintaining functional integrity and safety.
2Device complexity
If fixed IAR and COR are used in prosthetic disc, then device structure is simplified, but it fails to mimic natural spinal motion leading to facet joint damage and instability
Solution Approach 1:
The articulating units are designed with slider plates that move along curved paths, dynamically adjusting the instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) and center of rotation (COR) to mimic natural spinal motion. This dynamic adaptation prevents facet joint damage while maintaining reasonable structural complexity through standardized unit designs.
Solution Approach 2:
The prosthetic disc changes its geometric parameters (IAR and COR positions) dynamically during operation through the motion of articulating units. This allows the device to adapt to different spinal positions and loads, mimicking natural disc behavior without requiring overly complex control mechanisms.
3Ease of operation
If posterior implantation approach is used, then access to spinal disc is obtained, but bulky prosthetic discs contact spinal cord creating safety risks
Solution Approach 1:
By segmenting the prosthetic disc into multiple smaller articulating units, the overall insertion profile is reduced, allowing posterior access without contacting the spinal cord. The segmented units can be inserted through a narrower corridor while maintaining functional disc volume.
Solution Approach 2:
The articulating units incorporate flexible members and thin film-like slider plates that allow the prosthetic disc to bend and conform to the insertion path, enabling posterior approach while avoiding rigid contact with the spinal cord.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for inserting an intervertebral artificial disc is provided with the intervertebral disc including a first endplate having a plurality of protrusions for attaching to an adjacent vertebrae and an extension portion extending towards a second adjacent vertebrae. A second endplate is provided with a plurality of protrusions for attaching to a second adjacent vertebrae and an extension portion extending towards the first adjacent vertebrae. A flexible member having an upper portion and a lower portion and a slider plate positioned within the upper portion of the flexible member is also provided. The extension portion of the first endplate is adapted to fit within a first cavity in the upper portion of the flexible member and the extension portion of the second endplate is adapted to fit within a second cavity in the lower portion of the flexible member.


