Postural Awareness Device with Hall Effect Lumbar Alignment Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exercises for strengthening core and back muscles, such as pelvic tilts, lack effective feedback mechanisms to ensure proper alignment and prevent injury from improper posture.

Innovation Solution

A postural awareness device with a lumbar sensor and hall effect sensors that provide feedback through light, vibration, or sound when the lumbar is pressed against a resilient sensor body, adjusting intensity or frequency based on alignment with the centerline of the mat.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a pelvic tilt exercise is performed without feedback mechanisms, then the exercise can be performed simply, but proper alignment and muscle engagement cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproper alignmentVSAvoidfeedback mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms including visual indicators (lights), auditory signals (tones), and tactile feedback (vibrations) that respond to the user's pelvic tilt performance. These feedback devices provide real-time information about alignment accuracy and muscle engagement, allowing users to adjust their exercise form and achieve proper alignment reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical alignment verification systems with sensor-based detection systems. Hall effect sensors and magnetometers detect the position of magnetic markers on the user's body to determine alignment, substituting complex mechanical measurement systems with more precise and easier-to-implement magnetic field-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If feedback intensity is increased to improve alignment awareness, then user awareness improves, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment informationVSAvoidfeedback system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic feedback mechanisms where the intensity and characteristics of feedback signals vary based on the user's performance. The system adjusts feedback intensity dynamically - providing stronger signals for greater deviation from proper alignment and softer signals for acceptable alignment, optimizing information delivery without requiring maximum intensity continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes feedback parameters such as light brightness, vibration amplitude, and sound volume based on detected alignment quality. By varying these parameters according to performance level, the system delivers sufficient alignment information while avoiding unnecessary high-intensity feedback, thereby reducing overall system complexity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple feedback devices are used to provide comprehensive feedback, then feedback effectiveness improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback effectivenessVSAvoidnumber of feedback devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multi-functional feedback devices that can provide multiple types of feedback through a single component. For example, the control circuit can activate different combinations of visual, auditory, and tactile feedback devices based on the detected condition, allowing one system to serve multiple feedback functions and reduce overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple feedback delivery mechanisms into an integrated feedback system controlled by a single control circuit. The visual indicators, auditory signals, and tactile vibrations are merged into a coordinated feedback experience where the control circuit manages all feedback devices, reducing the complexity of independent control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If the sensor body is made more resilient to provide better feedback, then feedback accuracy improves, but the comfort during exercise decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different degrees of resilience to different parts of the sensor body. The sensor body is designed with varying firmness in different regions - firmer in areas requiring precise alignment detection and softer in areas prioritizing user comfort during the exercise. This localized differentiation allows the system to achieve both feedback accuracy and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances user awareness of proper posture alignment, preventing potential injuries and encouraging effective muscle engagement during exercises.

Implementation Method 1

A lumbar sensor having a magnet configured in a pliable extension of the sensor body and having a plurality of hall effect sensors configured to detect when the magnet is moved closer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12396678B2Postural awareness and exercise device
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 M&H INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US12396678B2 patent drawing
  • US12396678B2 patent drawing
  • US12396678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A postural awareness device provides feedback when the lumbar is press down against a lumbar sensor to move a magnet toward a hall effect sensor or sensors. The magnet is configured in a sensor body that extends from a posture training mat and is resilient, wherein the sensor body can be compressed by the lumbar and then spring back to an original shape. A feedback device may include a light device, a vibration device and/or a sound device. The feedback signal, light, vibration or sound may initiate when the magnet is actuated by compression of the sensor body toward the posture training mat. The feedback signal may then change intensity or frequency as the magnet is actuated further toward the hall effect sensor. A feedback light may change color as the magnet is brought closer to the hall effect sensor.