Posture-Responsive Neurostimulation With ECAP Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neuromodulation systems face challenges in maintaining effective neural recruitment while minimizing energy expenditure and addressing electrode migration and postural changes, which can alter neural recruitment and cause discomfort or ineffectiveness.

Innovation Solution

An implantable device with electrodes and a control unit that measures neural compound action potentials, estimates patient posture, and implements a feedback loop to maintain a constant recruitment level by adjusting stimulus parameters based on measured characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stimulus amplitude is increased to maintain neural recruitment above recruitment threshold, then therapeutic effect is improved, but patient comfort deteriorates due to recruitment of Aβ fibres causing uncomfortable sensations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural recruitmentVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures ECAP amplitude and uses it as feedback to adjust stimulus amplitude dynamically. This closed-loop feedback control maintains neural recruitment at the desired level while preventing excessive stimulation that would cause discomfort, thus resolving the contradiction between reliable neural recruitment and patient comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The stimulus amplitude is made dynamic rather than fixed, adjusting in real-time based on measured ECAP responses and detected posture changes. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain optimal recruitment levels across varying conditions without causing discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If stimulus amplitude is increased to compensate for electrode migration or postural changes, then neural recruitment is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural recruitmentVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback loop continuously monitors ECAP amplitude and adjusts stimulus amplitude only when necessary to maintain recruitment. This prevents wasteful energy consumption from continuously high stimulation levels while ensuring reliable neural recruitment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes stimulus parameters (amplitude, pulse width) based on measured responses and posture detection. By optimizing these parameters dynamically, the system maintains effective neural recruitment at minimal energy expenditure rather than using fixed high-amplitude stimulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of stationary object

If stimulus amplitude is kept low to minimize energy consumption, then battery lifetime is extended, but neural recruitment falls below therapeutic threshold

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifetimeVSAvoidtherapeutic effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism ensures stimulus amplitude is increased only when ECAP measurements indicate neural recruitment is falling below the therapeutic threshold. This maintains reliable therapeutic effect while minimizing energy consumption during periods when lower amplitudes are sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic ECAP measurements to monitor neural recruitment status and adjusts stimulation accordingly. This periodic feedback allows the system to maintain therapeutic effectiveness while using lower average power consumption compared to continuous high-amplitude stimulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Measurement precision

If ECAP measurements are taken continuously to monitor neural recruitment, then control precision is improved, but data storage requirements exceed implanted device capacities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural response monitoringVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential information from continuous ECAP measurements - specifically the amplitude values needed for feedback control - rather than storing complete waveforms. This extraction approach maintains measurement precision for control purposes while dramatically reducing data storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial measurement by focusing only on the critical ECAP amplitude parameter needed for feedback control, rather than comprehensively recording all aspects of the neural response. This partial measurement approach provides sufficient control precision while minimizing data volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures consistent therapeutic effects by adapting to postural changes, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing discomfort, thereby extending device lifetime and improving patient comfort.

Implementation Method 1

measurement circuitry for recording a neural compound action potential signal sensed at the one or more sense electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

An electrical pulse applied to the neural pathway by an electrode causes the depolarisation of neurons, and generation of propagating action potentials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentEP4204074B1Neurostimulation responsive to posture
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
  • EP4204074B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4204074B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4204074B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An implantable device is configured to control application of a neural stimulus as defined by a stimulus parameter; measure via the measurement circuitry a characteristic of a neural compound action potential response evoked by the stimulus; and compute, using the stimulus parameter and the measured characteristic of the evoked neural compound action potential response, a characteristic of an evoked response that would be obtained from the neural stimulus if the patient were in a reference posture. A posture of the patient can be estimated from the computed characteristic and/or the computed characteristic can be used as a feedback variable of a feedback loop. Multidimensional histograms of datasets comprising at least one of the stimulus parameter and a feedback variable can be stored.