Self-Balancing Poultry Water System Using Negative Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional poultry watering systems require manual adjustment of water pressure, leading to inefficiencies, complexity, and potential system failures, which can result in water deprivation for poultry, causing health issues and economic losses.

Innovation Solution

A self-balancing water distribution system using negative pressure, with a water conduit and air removal component to maintain controlled pressure, allowing for automatic adjustment and remote control of water pressure through sensors and vacuum apparatus, reducing the need for manual operation and minimizing mechanical failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual adjustment of water pressure is used at each individual watering valve, then water pressure can be controlled, but system complexity increases and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater pressure control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the water distribution network into multiple zones with separate control valves, allowing independent pressure control for different areas. This segmentation enables reliable pressure control without requiring manual adjustment at every individual valve, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates pressure sensors and control mechanisms that provide feedback to automatically regulate water pressure. This feedback control eliminates the need for manual pressure adjustment at each valve, reducing operational complexity while maintaining reliable pressure control through automated regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple individual water pressure regulators are used, then water pressure can be adjusted, but the number of components increases leading to more potential failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater pressure adjustment capabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple pressure regulation functions into a centralized control mechanism or zone-based valve system. This consolidation reduces the total number of individual pressure regulators and components, thereby reducing potential failure points while maintaining the ability to adjust water pressure for different needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional components that can perform multiple roles, such as valves that serve both as flow control and pressure regulation points. This universality reduces the number of specialized components needed, improving system reliability by reducing the total component count while preserving water pressure adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If manual operation and adjustment of water pressure regulators is performed, then pressure control is achieved, but labor requirements increase and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control accuracyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates self-regulating mechanisms such as automatic pressure control valves and sensors that maintain pressure without manual intervention. This self-service capability achieves accurate pressure control while eliminating the need for continuous manual adjustment, thereby improving operational efficiency and reducing labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical pressure adjustment with automated control systems using sensors, actuators, and electronic control. This substitution eliminates manual operation while maintaining pressure control accuracy, significantly improving operational efficiency and reducing labor intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If air is present in the water conduit system, then system setup is simpler, but water pressure is lost and system functionality is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem installation simplicityVSAvoidwater pressure maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates air removal valves and purging mechanisms that are activated during initial system setup and periodically during operation. This preliminary action removes trapped air to maintain water pressure while keeping the installation process simple, preventing pressure loss without complicating the manufacturing or installation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the presence of air pockets as indicators to trigger automatic air removal mechanisms. By converting the harmful effect of trapped air into a useful signal for system maintenance, the system maintains water pressure reliability while keeping the overall system design simple and easy to install.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures consistent and efficient water pressure distribution to poultry drinker lines, reducing labor costs, minimizing mechanical failures, and maintaining flock health by automatically adjusting water pressure and preventing air buildup, thus avoiding system failures.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum apparatus to remove entrapped air from the water conduit to help maintain negative pressure within the water conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

an improved, self-balancing water distribution system that uses negative pressure to distribute a water supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3697205B1Self-balancing poultry water distribution system
Publication Date: 2024.05.01 LUBING MASCHFAB LUDWIG BENING GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3697205B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3697205B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3697205B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

An improved, self-balancing water distribution system uses siphon characteristics to maintain negative pressure within the water system and to enable distribution of water to one or more distribution points, such as drinker lines with drinker nipples, at a controlled pressure, for consumption by poultry. The system includes water conduit (230) connected to and configured to distribute water from a water supply reservoir (210) to the one or more distribution points. The water level (212) of the water supply reservoir is used to control the water pressure within the system. A vacuum apparatus (225) is connected to the water conduit to remove entrapped air within the system to help maintain negative pressure within the conduit and throughout the system.