Monolithic Pour Crack Control Joint Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling cracks in monolithic pour concrete structures are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and unsatisfactory in terms of aesthetics and structural integrity, particularly when using saw-cutting techniques, which can lead to irregular cracks and weakened surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A joint assembly comprising an upper suspension line, a fracture inducing sheath with an elongate slit, and lateral reinforcement members, which are embedded within the concrete structure to control fractures along a predetermined axis, allowing for controlled cracking and expansion while maintaining structural integrity and aesthetics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If saw-cutting is used to form control joints, then control joints can be formed in monolithic pour concrete, but the process is expensive, tedious, and results in irregular configurations and wide unsightly joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol joint configurationVSAvoidcontrol joint formation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by embedding control joints into the concrete during the pouring process itself, rather than cutting them afterward. The control joints are pre-positioned using forms or embedded elements that guide crack formation, eliminating the need for post-pour saw-cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the control joint formation process from the post-pour cutting operation and integrates it into the pouring process itself. By using embedded forms or elements during pouring, the control joints are created as part of the concrete placement, removing the separate, labor-intensive cutting step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If multiple curing steps and form removal are used in checkerboard pattern pouring, then crack control is achieved, but the process becomes labor intensive and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack control effectivenessVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate pouring operations into a single monolithic pour by using control joints to manage cracking throughout the entire structure simultaneously. This eliminates the need for sequential checkerboard pouring, form removal, and multiple curing cycles, reducing both time and labor while maintaining crack control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If control joints are saw-cut after partial curing, then cracks can be controlled, but the edges degrade over time and the joints are wide and unsightly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack location controlVSAvoidconcrete surface integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by embedding control joint forms or elements during the pouring process that guide crack formation at precise locations. This pre-positioning ensures cracks occur exactly where needed while maintaining narrow, aesthetically pleasing joint widths and preventing edge degradation that occurs with post-pour saw-cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient and aesthetically pleasing control of cracks in monolithic pour concrete structures, reducing labor and time requirements while maintaining structural integrity by allowing controlled cracking and expansion, and avoiding the drawbacks of traditional saw-cutting methods.

Implementation Method 1

permitting linear expansion and contraction of the blocks while also maintaining the blocks in a common plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

shrinkage resulting from hydration during the curing process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShrinkage: Length Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS7381007B2Monolithic pour crack control system and method of use
Publication Date: 2008.06.03 SHAW & SONS
  • US7381007B2 patent drawing
  • US7381007B2 patent drawing
  • US7381007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A joint assembly for controlling fractures along a fracture axis in a monolithic pour concrete structure is provided. The concrete structure is defined by a first edge form section and a generally opposed second edge form section. The joint assembly is characterized by a suspension line extending between the first edge form section and the second edge form section, and a fracture inducing sheath suspended therefrom within the concrete structure. The sheath may define an elongate slit that exposes an internal channel that the suspension line traverses. Additionally, a method for forming a control joint in a monolithic pour concrete structure via the joint assembly is provided.