Powder Bed 3D Printing with Heated Binder and Perimeter Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current three-dimensional printing methods face challenges in efficiently forming complex objects with precise control over layer thickness and perimeter generation, often resulting in deviations from the intended model design and requiring multiple curing steps, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a powder bed with alternating layers and binding substances, where a binding substance is applied and then selectively heated, with cutters used to generate perimeters according to a model design, allowing for precise control over layer thickness and perimeter formation, and optional curing at various temperatures to bind the layers securely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional three-dimensional printing methods are used to form complex objects, then objects can be created with various shapes, but manufacturing precision and control over layer thickness are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer thickness controlVSAvoidprinting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The printing process is segmented into distinct operational phases: binder application, heating, cutting, and layer deposition. Each phase is independently controlled to optimize layer thickness precision without increasing overall process complexity. The cutter specifically generates perimeters with controlled thickness, while the binder applicator handles area binding separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters including heating temperature, binder application rate, and cutter depth based on real-time feedback from sensors. This dynamic control enables precise layer thickness management while adapting to variations in material properties and environmental conditions during the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If multiple curing steps are applied to ensure proper layer bonding, then structural integrity is improved, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer bonding strengthVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The curing function is merged into the heating step by applying controlled heat during the binder setting process. This integrated approach combines binder curing and layer bonding into a single thermal processing step, eliminating the need for separate curing cycles and reducing total production time while maintaining adequate layer bonding strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes heating parameters including temperature, duration, and distribution pattern to achieve sufficient binder curing and layer bonding in a single step. By carefully controlling these parameters, the process achieves adequate structural integrity without requiring multiple prolonged curing cycles, thus improving production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If perimeters are generated with high precision according to model design, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperimeter accuracyVSAvoidcutter system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The perimeter generation process replaces complex mechanical cutting paths with a simplified cutter that operates in conjunction with controlled material deposition. The cutter generates perimeters by removing excess material after the binder and powder have been deposited, allowing precise perimeter definition through a less complex mechanical system compared to traditional multi-axis cutting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If binding substances are applied extensively to ensure complete layer coverage, then reliability of layer bonding is improved, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer bonding reliabilityVSAvoidbinder material consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The binder application system transitions from uniform extensive coverage to localized targeted application. The binder is applied specifically to areas requiring bonding based on the model design requirements, with controlled distribution patterns that ensure adequate bonding reliability only where needed. This local quality approach reduces overall binder consumption while maintaining necessary bonding strength in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the rapid and precise formation of three-dimensional objects with minimal deviation from the model design, reducing production time and improving the structural integrity of the final product by ensuring accurate layer bonding and perimeter definition.

Implementation Method 1

a binding substance is applied and then selectively heated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

heating a first subsection of the first area, wherein the first subsection is generated from a model design of the three-dimensional object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 3

heating a second subsection of the second area, wherein the second subsection is generated from the model design of the three-dimensional object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 4

optional curing at various temperatures to bind the layers securely

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal bonding: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12138857B2Devices and methods for three-dimensional printing
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 3DEO INC
  • US12138857B2 patent drawing
  • US12138857B2 patent drawing
  • US12138857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides systems and methods for the formation of three-dimensional objects. A method for forming a three-dimensional object may comprise alternately and sequentially applying a stream comprising a binding substance to an area of a layer of powder material in a powder bed, and generating at least one perimeter of the three-dimensional object in the area. The stream may be applied in accordance with a model design of the three-dimensional object. The at least one perimeter may generated in accordance with the model design.