Multi-Laser Powder Bed Fusion Defect Mapping From Build Files

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tools lack the capability to predict defect formation and dependency on process parameters in multi-laser additive manufacturing, particularly in powder bed fusion processes, which complicates material quality control and increases production challenges.

Innovation Solution

An analysis tool comprising a build file module, preprocessor, prime module, and defect code module that processes inputs such as laser overlap, scan speed, and powder particle size to generate temperature maps, defect maps, and time-location maps, predicting defect locations and sizes, and providing preliminary quality metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-laser additive manufacturing is used to increase production rate and allowable part size, then productivity is improved, but defect formation becomes more complex and harder to predict

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of productionVSAvoidmaterial quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by developing a predictive model that forecasts defect formation before actual multi-laser additive manufacturing occurs. The model uses process parameters (laser power, scan speed, hatch distance) to predict temperature maps and defect locations in advance, allowing parameter optimization before production to prevent defects rather than detect them after formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating virtual replicas of the additive manufacturing process through computational modeling. The software generates simulated temperature maps, defect maps, and time-location maps that mirror actual manufacturing conditions, allowing virtual testing and optimization without physical trial-and-error manufacturing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional empirical prototyping is used to determine part quality, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but loss of time and production efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoiditerative prototyping time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical empirical prototyping with virtual copying through computational models. The software creates digital twins of the manufacturing process, generating predicted temperature distributions and defect maps that replicate actual manufacturing outcomes without requiring physical test parts, thereby eliminating iterative prototyping time while maintaining quality assessment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes mechanical trial-and-error manufacturing with computational analysis. Instead of physically producing test parts and examining them for defects, the system uses software-based predictive modeling with algorithms that calculate temperature maps, defect maps, and process optimization based on input parameters, replacing the mechanical iterative process with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive analysis of process parameters is conducted to predict defect formation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect prediction accuracyVSAvoidanalysis tool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex analysis into distinct functional modules: a build file module for parameter input, a preprocessor for data preparation, a prime module for core calculations, and a defect code module for defect prediction. This modular architecture manages complexity by organizing the comprehensive analysis into separable, manageable components that can be developed and maintained independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by introducing a software-based analysis tool that acts as a mediator between process parameters and defect outcomes. The software serves as an intermediate layer that translates input parameters (laser power, scan speed, hatch distance) into predicted temperature maps and defect maps, simplifying the complex relationship between multiple parameters and defect formation without requiring direct physical experimentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the prediction of defect formation in multi-laser additive manufacturing, reducing the need for empirical prototyping and minimizing costly trial-and-error methods, thereby enhancing production efficiency and part quality.

Implementation Method 1

a temperature map representing local temperature increase as a result of prior layers, stripes and hatching, laser thermal interaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser thermal interaction: Laser

Implementation Method 2

temperature map representing local temperature increase as a result of prior layers, stripes and hatching

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20240393765A1Predictive model for multi-laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 RTX CORP
  • US20240393765A1 patent drawing
  • US20240393765A1 patent drawing
  • US20240393765A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An analysis tool for multi-laser additive manufacturing including a build file module; a preprocessor in operative communication with the build file module; a prime module in operative communication with the preprocessor; and a defect code module in operative communication with the prime module.