Powder Bed Fusion Control for Real-Time Defect Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing powder bed fusion processes for additive manufacturing lack the ability to dynamically adjust process parameters such as power and scan rate during the manufacturing process, leading to defects like key-holing, balling, and unmelt porosity.

Innovation Solution

A model-based dynamic control scheme that adjusts energy beam power and scan rate in real-time to avoid defect regions, using predictive modeling of melt pool, energy density, and porosity to ensure high-quality component production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If preset themes with fixed parameters are used for different geometries, then the process is simple to operate, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to adapt to local variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control scheme transitions from static preset themes to dynamic adaptive control where process parameters (power, speed, hatch spacing) are continuously adjusted during the manufacturing process based on real-time monitoring of melt pool characteristics and geometric features, enabling both ease of operation and high manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies process parameters such as laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing based on detected geometric features (overhangs, thin walls, sharp corners) and melt pool conditions, allowing the same preset theme to adapt to local variations and maintain manufacturing precision across different geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If single power and single speed parameters are used for entire themes, then the device complexity is low, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to address local geometric variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into multiple passes with different parameter sets: first pass uses higher power and slower speed to establish initial melt pool and fuse powder, second pass uses lower power and faster speed to refine the surface, enabling high manufacturing precision without excessive device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different parameter combinations during the process based on geometric features and melt pool state, allowing simple device architecture to achieve complex manufacturing precision requirements through intelligent parameter variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If preset themes with fixed parameters are used, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the reliability deteriorates due to defects like key-holing, balling, and unmelt porosity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback monitoring of melt pool characteristics (size, temperature, stability) and automatically adjusts process parameters to maintain optimal conditions, preventing defects such as key-holing, balling, and unmelt porosity while preserving ease of operation through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically responds to changing process conditions by continuously adjusting power and speed parameters based on real-time melt pool monitoring, ensuring reliable defect-free manufacturing without requiring complex manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces defects in additive manufacturing by dynamically controlling process parameters, resulting in higher quality components with fewer defects.

Implementation Method 1

melting/fusing select regions of the layers using an energy beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser melting: Laser

Implementation Method 2

Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS12605887B2Adaptive control for powder fusion
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 RTX CORP
  • US12605887B2 patent drawing
  • US12605887B2 patent drawing
  • US12605887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A powder processing machine includes a work bed, a powder deposition device operable to deposit layers of powder in the work bed, an energy beam device operable to emit an energy beam with a variable beam power and scan the energy beam in a path across the powder in the work bed with a variable beam scan rate to melt and fuse regions of the powder, a sensor operable to detect process characteristics in the work bed by location in the work bed during scanning of the energy beam and produce signals representative of the process characteristics and locations, and a controller in communication with the sensor to receive the signals. The controller is configured to identify anomalies in the process characteristics and responsively adjust at least one of the beam power or the beam scan rate at the locations of the anomalies.