Powder Injection Lance for Reducing Agglomeration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for activated carbon injection in power plants face limitations due to agglomeration of powdered activated carbon, which reduces the available reactive surface area and contaminant removal efficiency, especially in high-volume, low-concentration flue gases with limited contact time.

Innovation Solution

The development of advanced lance systems with specific nozzle geometries that utilize flow profiles to break agglomerates into primary particle sizes, enhancing dispersion and reactive surface area through local accelerations, particle collisions, boundary interactions, and gas pressure-induced stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If powdered activated carbon is injected into high-volume flue gas, then contaminant removal capacity increases, but particle agglomeration occurs reducing reactive surface area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant removal capacityVSAvoidreactive surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The lance divides the powder stream into multiple smaller sub-streams through multiple outlets, preventing particles from clumping together. This segmentation maintains individual particle surface area while increasing total contaminant removal capacity through higher injection rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lance features an inner tubular member with outlets positioned within the flow path of an outer tubular member. This nested configuration allows the inner member to break up agglomerates formed by the outer member's flow, creating a multi-stage dispersion system that preserves reactive surface area at high injection rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Productivity

If powder injection rate is increased to maximize contaminant removal, then treatment capacity improves, but agglomeration increases reducing particle dispersion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant removal efficiencyVSAvoidparticle dispersion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The lance creates dynamic flow conditions where gas velocity and turbulence vary across different zones. The inner tubular member is positioned to create high-velocity jets that dynamically break up agglomerates formed by the outer member's lower-velocity flow, maintaining particle dispersion at high injection rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The lance uses a three-dimensional nested configuration with outlets at different positions and angles. This spatial arrangement creates multi-directional flow patterns that prevent particles from settling into agglomerates, maintaining dispersion in all dimensions even at high injection rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If contact time is extended to improve mercury adsorption, then removal efficiency increases, but system complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lance uses pneumatic principles to create high-velocity gas flows that enhance mixing and mass transfer between particles and flue gas. This increases the effective reaction rate, allowing shorter contact times while maintaining high mercury removal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The lance modifies flow parameters (velocity, turbulence, pressure) to optimize the reaction kinetics. By creating high-velocity turbulent flows, the system increases mass transfer coefficients, compensating for reduced contact time and maintaining removal efficiency without extending residence time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases contaminant removal efficiency by maintaining a linear trend of mercury removal with increasing injection rates, reducing agglomeration, and improving particle distribution within the flue gas duct, as demonstrated by increased mercury removal rates in experimental tests.

Implementation Method 1

agglomerates break when they interact with a boundary (physical, static, or dynamic). Fourth, agglomerates break when subjected to gas pressure acting within the agglomerate, which induces sufficient stress in the agglomerate to overcome attractive forces between particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure-induced stress: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

flow profiles induce the breaking of agglomerates to reduce the average particle size down closer to the primary particle sizes of powder PAC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

agglomerates break apart when they interact with other agglomerates in the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParticle collisions: Impact Force

Implementation Method 4

agglomerates break when they interact with a boundary (physical, static, or dynamic)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer interaction: Boundary Layer

Implementation Method 5

Once introduced to the process gas, the sorbent adsorbs mercury

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentEP3204141B1Systems, lances, nozzles, and methods for powder injection resulting in reduced agglomeration
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 CARBONXT INC
  • EP3204141B1 patent drawingFigure 1A1~1C2
  • EP3204141B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3204141B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A lance (400) for powder injection resulting in reduced agglomeration, including an outer tubular member (408) having a first end (412), a second end (404), and an inner flowpath extending from the first end to the second end; an inner tubular member (408) having a first end (412), a second end (404), and an inner flowpath (416) extending from the first end to the second end, the inner tubular member disposed within the inner flowpath of the outer tubular member for providing an annular space (410) between the outer tubular member and the inner tubular member; and one or more orifices (418) in the inner tubular member for providing a flowpath between the annular space and the inner flowpath of the inner tubular member. Additional lances, nozzles, systems, and methods are also included.