Transmitter Power Allocation for Wireless Channels with Imperfect Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobile communication systems face challenges in optimally allocating transmission power across channels with varying capacities and uncertain channel quality, leading to inefficient power usage and suboptimal communication rates due to limited radio resources and statistical errors in channel quality estimation.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves remote units providing channel quality feedback to the base station, which processes this information to obtain operational estimates and uses an iterative computational process to allocate power among channels, accounting for the probability of actual channel qualities, employing a water-filling paradigm to maximize channel capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fade margin is added to transmit level to insure successful communication, then reliability is improved, but power efficiency deteriorates due to wasted power from too big margins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of transmit power allocation from fixed fade margin addition to dynamic allocation based on water-filling principle. Instead of adding uniform dB margins to all channels, the system calculates optimal power distribution P(n) = max(0, μ - log(σ²(n)/C(n))) where μ is determined by total power constraint, allowing adaptive power assignment that matches actual channel conditions while respecting uncertainty bounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic power allocation that adapts to varying channel conditions and uncertainty levels. The water-filling algorithm continuously adjusts power distribution across channels based on current channel quality estimates and uncertainty parameters, transforming the static fade margin approach into a dynamic optimization process that responds to real-time channel variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If fade margin is reduced to improve power efficiency, then power efficiency is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to excessive error-rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the power allocation parameters to include uncertainty bounds σ²(n) in the water-filling formula. By incorporating the variance of channel quality estimates into the power calculation P(n) = max(0, μ - log(σ²(n)/C(n))), the system automatically adjusts power levels to maintain reliability while avoiding excessive margins, achieving optimal balance between power efficiency and error rate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from channel quality indicators and uncertainty measurements to continuously refine power allocation decisions. The water-filling algorithm incorporates real-time feedback about channel conditions and estimation accuracy, adjusting power distribution to maintain target error rates while maximizing power efficiency based on observed channel behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If coarse CQI encoding is used for feedback, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to significant quantization errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback processing complexityVSAvoidchannel quality precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separately handles the uncertainty component from channel quality feedback. Instead of attempting to encode precise channel quality values, the system extracts the mean estimate and the variance/uncertainty bound as separate feedback elements. This allows coarse CQI encoding to suffice for the mean while the uncertainty parameter captures the precision information needed for robust power allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the feedback parameter from precise channel quality values to a pair of parameters: mean channel quality estimate and uncertainty bound. This parameter transformation allows the use of coarse quantization for the mean while the uncertainty bound compensates for quantization errors, enabling simple feedback encoding without sacrificing measurement precision in the power allocation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of energy

If iterative computational process is used for optimal power allocation, then power efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial iteration by performing the water-filling optimization only when necessary (e.g., when channel conditions change significantly or uncertainty bounds update). Rather than continuously iterating, the system uses threshold-based triggers to initiate computational updates, performing the full iterative water-filling calculation only when the potential improvement justifies the computational cost, otherwise using previous allocations with minor adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8892152B2Resource allocation for channels with imperfect feedback
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8892152B2 patent drawing
  • US8892152B2 patent drawing
  • US8892152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus optimizes transmitter power allocations among a plurality of wireless channels that connect to remote units. The optimizing is effected by the remote units sending information to the base stations regarding the quality of the channels. The apparatus modifies the received information to arrive at operating estimates that account for service grades, and through an iterating process that accounts for probability of actual channel qualities relative to the operating estimates of the channel qualities, allocates the transmitter's power to the different channels.