Power Cable Fault Detection Using RMS and THD for Sub-Cycle Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional Faulted Circuit Indicators (FCIs) fail to detect self-clearing, sub-cycle faults in electrical power distribution systems, which can lead to cable failure and power outages due to incipient faults lasting less than ½ a cycle and characterized by similar pre- and post-fault load conditions, occurring on one phase, and starting at the voltage waveform apex.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a current peak detector and total harmonic distortion (THD) analysis to identify incipient faults by comparing RMS current values and THD before and after a threshold event, independent of waveform analysis, and reporting incipient faults when current values are within a predetermined percentage and THD differs by a specific percentage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional FCI systems are used to detect faults, then the system is simple and reliable for full-cycle faults, but it fails to detect self-clearing sub-cycle faults that last less than 1/2 a cycle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent analysis paths: FCI fault analysis path and incipient fault analysis path. Each path handles specific fault types with dedicated algorithms, allowing the system to detect both full-cycle FCI faults and sub-cycle incipient faults without requiring a completely complex unified detection mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which analysis path to execute based on the characteristics of the detected fault event. By evaluating fault duration and comparing against thresholds, the system adapts its detection strategy in real-time, applying FCI analysis for sustained faults and incipient fault analysis for brief sub-cycle events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If FCI analysis is performed for all fault events, then full-cycle faults are detected reliably, but sub-cycle incipient faults with similar pre- and post-fault load conditions remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection precisionVSAvoidanalysis method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different analysis methods are applied to different fault types based on their local characteristics. FCI analysis with trip threshold comparison is applied to full-cycle faults, while incipient fault analysis using RMS current and THD comparison is applied to sub-cycle events. This localized approach optimizes detection precision for each fault category without unnecessarily complicating the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameters based on fault characteristics. For incipient faults, it uses RMS current values and total harmonic distortion (THD) as key parameters with predetermined percentage thresholds, rather than relying solely on traditional FCI trip thresholds. This parameter adaptation enables precise detection of subtle sub-cycle fault signatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors all fault events with detailed analysis, then detection accuracy improves, but the response time and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial analysis initially by quickly evaluating basic fault characteristics against thresholds. Only when faults meet specific criteria (sub-cycle duration, similar pre- and post-fault conditions) does the system execute the more computationally intensive incipient fault analysis involving RMS and THD calculations. This partial action approach maintains high detection accuracy while minimizing unnecessary processing time for obvious FCI faults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4085264B1Method and system for detecting self-clearing, sub-cycle faults
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • EP4085264B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4085264B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3B
  • EP4085264B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method of detecting self-clearing, sub-cycle faults comprises sensing a current condition and a voltage condition at a location along a power cable. The sensed conditions are relayed to an analyzing device, the analyzing device including a current peak detector. The presence of a measured current value is determined. If the measured current value is greater than a current threshold value, a faulted circuit indicator (FCI) analysis is performed to determine the presence or absence of an FCI fault. If an FCI fault is absent, an incipient fault analysis is performed, wherein the RMS current values before and after a threshold event are compared and the voltage total harmonic distortion (THD) before and after the event are compared. If the two current values are within a first predetermined percentage and the THD values differ by a second predetermined percentage, then an incipient fault is reported. If either the two current values are not within the first predetermined percentage or the THD values do not differ by at least the second predetermined percentage, an unclassified event is reported.