Power System Contingency Analysis via HPC and Visual Situational Awareness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power system contingency analysis tools face challenges such as high computational requirements, difficulty in data aggregation and interpretation, lack of available parameters for protection elements, and prediction of small-signal instabilities, which hinder effective analysis of cascading outages in power systems.

Innovation Solution

Deploying a contingency analysis tool in a high-performance computing environment and incorporating visual situational awareness approaches, along with calculations and coordination of protection element settings using small-signal nomograms, to enhance the ability of power system engineers to evaluate and analyze cascading events efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If steady-state and transient simulations are performed using conventional power system analysis tools, then simulation results can be obtained, but the computing power required is extensive and the computation speed is inherently slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidcomputation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation process is divided into multiple independent tasks that can be executed in parallel across a distributed computing cluster. Each computing node handles specific simulation tasks, allowing the overall computation to be performed concurrently rather than sequentially, thus improving computation speed while maintaining simulation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A task management system acts as an intermediary between the user interface and the distributed computing cluster. This intermediary coordinates task distribution, manages computing resources, and aggregates results, enabling efficient utilization of multiple computing nodes without requiring users to directly manage the complexity of parallel computing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive data from power system simulations is collected, then complete analysis information is available, but the data aggregation and interpretation become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple data sources from different simulation tasks and computing nodes are merged into a unified data structure. The system combines results from various contingency analyses, protection element data, and system state information into a single coherent view that can be easily interpreted while maintaining complete information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified representations or copies of complex simulation data in multiple formats suitable for different analysis purposes. This allows the same underlying data to be accessed and interpreted in various ways without requiring users to manually process the raw comprehensive data sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If protection element parameters such as relay configurations are included in the analysis, then more accurate simulation results are achieved, but the required parameters are not available to power-planning engineers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection element accuracyVSAvoidparameter accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Protection element parameters such as relay configurations are pre-configured and stored in a database before the contingency analysis is performed. This preliminary preparation ensures that accurate protection data is readily available when needed for simulation, eliminating the need for engineers to manually gather these specialized parameters at the time of analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically retrieves and utilizes protection element parameters from its own database without requiring external input from engineers. The contingency analysis tool self-serves by accessing pre-stored relay configurations and protection settings, making accurate protection data accessible without requiring engineers to have specialized knowledge or external resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If small-signal instabilities are analyzed in detail, then cascading outage prediction is improved, but these instabilities are difficult to predict and simulate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecascading event predictionVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical simulation of small-signal instabilities with computational algorithms that calculate stability margins using mathematical models. Instead of performing full dynamic simulations of minor disturbances, the system uses computational methods to assess stability, reducing simulation complexity while improving the ability to predict cascading events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11592788B2Enhanced dynamic contingency analysis for power systems
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • US11592788B2 patent drawing
  • US11592788B2 patent drawing
  • US11592788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes systems and techniques that enhance effectiveness and efficiency of a contingency analysis tool that is used for studying the magnitude and likelihood of extreme contingencies and potential cascading events across a power system. The described systems and techniques include deploying the contingency analysis tool in a high-performance computing (HPC) environment and incorporating visual situational awareness approaches to allow power system engineers to quickly and efficiently evaluate multiple power system simulation models. Furthermore, the described systems and techniques include the power system contingency-analysis tool calculating and coordinating protection element settings, as well as assessing controls of the power system using small-signal nomograms, allowing power system engineers to more effectively comprehend, evaluate, and analyze causes and effects of cascading events against a topology of a power system.