Process Gas Generation via Power-Controlled Vaporization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for delivering low volatility process gases, such as hydrogen peroxide, from source liquids in microelectronics and critical processes face challenges with precise control due to high variability in carrier gas flow, temperature, and pressure, leading to inconsistent and hazardous concentrations, especially when using multi-component solutions.

Innovation Solution

Control the power input into the source liquid to regulate vaporization, allowing for a direct and linear relationship between power and vapor generation, independent of carrier gas flow and temperature, enabling stable and precise delivery of process gases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If bubblers are used for direct liquid to carrier gas mass transfer, then process gas delivery is achieved, but excessive micro-droplet formation and particle generation occur leading to poor delivery precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess gas deliveryVSAvoiddelivery precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a vaporization chamber as an intermediary device between the source liquid and carrier gas. The source liquid is vaporized in the chamber, and the vapor then mixes with the carrier gas. This intermediary vaporization process eliminates direct liquid-gas contact that causes droplet formation, thereby improving delivery precision while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transition by vaporizing the source liquid in a controlled chamber before mixing with carrier gas. This phase change from liquid to vapor prevents micro-droplet formation and particle generation, resolving the contradiction between ease of delivery and delivery precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Productivity

If vaporizers are used for high temperature vaporization, then gas phase process chemical is obtained, but liquid molecule decomposition occurs altering stability and concentration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor generation rateVSAvoidmolecule stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the vaporization temperature parameter to be the minimum required for effective vaporization rather than using high temperatures. This parameter change maintains productivity by ensuring sufficient vapor generation while preserving molecule stability and preventing decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback control to monitor and adjust vaporization conditions, ensuring that temperature remains within the optimal range that prevents decomposition while maintaining adequate vapor generation rates for productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multi-component solutions are used as source liquid, then diverse process chemicals are available, but composition variability increases making precise control difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical diversityVSAvoidconcentration control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multi-component solution into individual components, vaporizing each separately in the vaporization chamber. This segmentation allows precise control of each component's vaporization and mixing ratios, maintaining chemical diversity while achieving precise concentration control that would be impossible with direct multi-component vaporization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If tight control of temperature, pressure, and flow rate is implemented, then delivery accuracy improves, but system complexity and calibration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vaporization chamber system is designed to be inherently more stable and less sensitive to variations in temperature, pressure, and flow rate. The vaporization process itself provides natural regulation, reducing the need for complex active control systems and simplifying calibration while maintaining high delivery accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies calibration, improves productivity and safety by using surrogate chemicals like water, and maintains stable steady-state concentrations of low volatility components, reducing the risk of hazardous conditions and improving process control.

Implementation Method 1

Controlling the power input into the source liquid to regulate vaporization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11154792B2Methods and systems for generating process gases
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 RASIRC INC
  • US11154792B2 patent drawing
  • US11154792B2 patent drawing
  • US11154792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for the gas-phase delivery of gases, such as process gases, from the gas phase of a multicomponent source liquid are provided. The methods are generally directed to the generation of process gases having mass flow rates which are proportional to the input power delivered to the multicomponent source liquid containers. The methods may be used to deliver process gases to critical process applications.