Solid State Power Controller Gate Shutdown Without Secondary Fuses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High power solid state power controllers face issues with protection in failure modes where the gate driver is shorted ON or the primary controller malfunctions, leading to uncontrolled power supply and increased fault currents, which require larger fuses that occupy more space and dissipate more heat, making the configuration unworkable, and secondary fuses render the channel unavailable after blowing open.

Innovation Solution

Integration of a secondary controller that detects faults and disables the gate driver to prevent the gate from being stuck ON, eliminating the need for secondary fuses by using smaller FETs and a gate switch to manage power distribution, allowing individual FETs to clear faults without a large secondary fuse, thus maintaining channel availability and reducing heat dissipation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If secondary fuses are used to protect against uncontrolled power supply and fault currents, then system protection is improved, but board space increases and heat dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem protectionVSAvoidboard space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the secondary fuse component entirely from the system by implementing a control architecture where the secondary controller detects faults and disables the gate driver through control signals, extracting the protection function from a passive component (fuse) to an active control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical protection mechanism of fuses (which physically open to break circuits) with an electronic control mechanism where the secondary controller sends disable signals to the gate driver, substituting a passive physical protection system with an active electronic control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If secondary fuses are used to protect against uncontrolled power supply and fault currents, then system protection is improved, but heat dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem protectionVSAvoidheat dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the secondary fuse component entirely from the system by implementing a control architecture where the secondary controller detects faults and disables the gate driver through control signals, extracting the protection function from a passive component (fuse) to an active control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical protection mechanism of fuses (which physically open to break circuits) with an electronic control mechanism where the secondary controller sends disable signals to the gate driver, substituting a passive physical protection system with an active electronic control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If larger fuses are used to handle increased fault currents, then fault current protection is improved, but board space increases and heat dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault current protectionVSAvoidboard space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical protection mechanism of fuses (which physically open to break circuits) with an electronic control mechanism where the secondary controller sends disable signals to the gate driver, substituting a passive physical protection system with an active electronic control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary controller performs preliminary fault detection and sends disable signals to the gate driver before fault currents can escalate to dangerous levels, preventing the need for oversized protection components by addressing the issue proactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If secondary fuses are used to protect against uncontrolled power supply, then system protection is improved, but channel availability is lost after fuse blows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem protectionVSAvoidchannel availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis through the secondary controller detecting faults and automatically disabling the gate driver, allowing the system to identify and respond to failures without requiring external intervention or component replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary controller performs preliminary fault detection and sends disable signals to the gate driver before fault currents can escalate to dangerous levels, preventing the need for oversized protection components by addressing the issue proactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3419133B1Elimination of secondary fuses in high power solid state power controllers
Publication Date: 2024.12.11 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • EP3419133B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3419133B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3419133B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Embodiments include a technique for eliminating secondary fuses in high power solid state power controllers, the technique includes controlling gate power provided to a field effect transistor array, and detecting a failure mode. The technique also includes disabling the gate power based at least in part on detecting the failure mode, and restoring the gate power responsive to resolving the failure mode.