Power Converter Compensation Network Design Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design of compensation networks for switching power converters is a difficult and time-consuming process, often resulting in unstable operation, oscillations, and reduced lifespan due to manual inaccuracies and neglect of key design parameters like operational amplifier bandwidth and parasitics.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for compensation network design in power converters that computes optimal values for compensation components based on loop specifications such as crossover frequency, phase margin, and gain margin, using a hybrid optimization method combining differential evolution and conjugate gradient algorithms, and applies these values to redesign the compensation network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual compensation design is used, then design flexibility is maintained, but design time increases and design accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign accuracyVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical design processes with automated computer-based optimization algorithms. The system uses differential evolution and conjugate gradient algorithms to automatically compute compensation component values, eliminating manual iterations and significantly improving both design speed and accuracy while maintaining design flexibility through programmable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the compensation design problem into a parameter optimization problem. By defining an objective function that evaluates design quality based on loop specifications (phase margin, gain margin, crossover frequency), the system automatically adjusts compensation component parameters to achieve optimal values, replacing manual trial-and-error with systematic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual compensation design is used, then design complexity is manageable, but design reliability decreases due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign reliabilityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual design processes with automated computer-based optimization algorithms. The system uses differential evolution and conjugate gradient algorithms to automatically compute compensation component values, eliminating manual iterations and significantly improving both design speed and accuracy while maintaining design flexibility through programmable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the optimization algorithm continuously evaluates design candidates against loop specifications and adjusts parameters accordingly. The system provides feedback on design quality through the objective function, automatically refining compensation values until specifications are met, thereby improving reliability through systematic validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If comprehensive loop specifications are considered, then design robustness improves, but design process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational stabilityVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the compensation design problem into a parameter optimization problem. By defining an objective function that evaluates design quality based on loop specifications (phase margin, gain margin, crossover frequency), the system automatically adjusts compensation component parameters to achieve optimal values, replacing manual trial-and-error with systematic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal optimization framework that handles multiple loop specifications simultaneously through a single objective function. This multi-functional approach allows the system to optimize for stability, bandwidth, and other performance criteria together, rather than addressing each specification separately, thereby simplifying the overall design process while improving robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11853664B2Compensation design of power converters
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US11853664B2 patent drawing
  • US11853664B2 patent drawing
  • US11853664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for compensation network design in a power converter design system is provided that includes computing optimal values for compensation components in a compensation network based on a plurality of loop specifications comprising crossover frequency (Fco), phase margin (PM), Gain Margin (GM), and low frequency gain (LFG), and applying changes to a power converter design comprising the compensation network based on the optimal values.