Power Converter Negative Slew Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power converter circuits in computer systems face inefficiencies during negative slew operations, as they often maintain fixed operating modes, leading to extra power dissipation and inability to meet voltage and time targets efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A power converter circuit that autonomously determines and changes its operating mode based on the slew rate of the regulated output voltage, using a control circuit to monitor the voltage level and switch between different operating modes to meet efficiency and time targets during a negative slew.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the power converter circuit maintains a fixed operating mode during negative slew operations, then the circuit structure remains simple, but extra power dissipation occurs and voltage/time targets cannot be met efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidoperating mode control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power converter circuit dynamically switches between different operating modes (first operating mode and second operating mode) based on the detected slew rate conditions. The control circuit monitors the slew rate and autonomously determines when to transition modes, making the system adaptive rather than static, thereby reducing power dissipation during negative slew operations without requiring complex external control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit is configured to autonomously detect the slew rate and automatically determine the appropriate operating mode without external intervention. This self-service capability allows the circuit to optimize its own power dissipation by selecting the most efficient operating mode based on real-time conditions, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If the power converter circuit uses a single operating mode, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to meet voltage and time targets during negative slew operations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage transition efficiencyVSAvoidoperating mode determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit employs multiple operating modes that can be dynamically selected based on operational conditions. During negative slew operations, the control circuit detects the slew rate and transitions between modes to optimize voltage transition efficiency, ensuring time and voltage targets are met while maintaining manageable complexity through autonomous control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit changes operational parameters by switching between different operating modes based on the detected slew rate. This parameter change allows the circuit to adapt its behavior to meet specific voltage and time targets during negative slew operations, improving productivity without requiring complex external control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the control circuit autonomously monitors slew rate and changes operating modes, then power dissipation is reduced and efficiency goals are met, but the control circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency goal achievementVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit performs self-monitoring of the slew rate and autonomous determination of operating modes without requiring external control logic. This self-service approach ensures reliability and efficiency goal achievement while minimizing the increase in control circuit complexity, as the additional functionality is integrated within the existing control structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit implements feedback by continuously monitoring the slew rate and using this information to autonomously determine and switch between operating modes. This feedback mechanism ensures that efficiency goals are met during negative slew operations while keeping the control circuit complexity manageable through intelligent, condition-based decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11431249B2Negative slew rate control for power converters
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 APPLE INC
  • US11431249B2 patent drawing
  • US11431249B2 patent drawing
  • US11431249B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power converter circuit that includes a switch node coupled to a regulated power supply node via an inductor is configured to regulate a voltage level of a power supply node using a particular one of multiple available operating modes. In response to receiving a command to reduce the voltage level of the power supply node, the power converter circuit begins to reduce the voltage level of the power supply node, while autonomously selecting different ones of available operating modes. The power converter circuit may compare to the voltage level of the power supply node to boundary levels and select a different operating mode when the voltage level of the power supply node exceeds one of the boundaries. By switching operating modes during the negative slew of the voltage level of the power supply node, the power converter may maintain a target efficiency during the reduction in voltage.