Power Controller Coupling Assemblies for Flexible Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power control systems require separate controllers for each heater, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs when process changes necessitate reconfiguration, as significant rewiring and additional parts are needed.

Innovation Solution

A power controller coupling assembly that uses adapter, jumper, and terminator cable assemblies to provide power in a parallel configuration, ensuring continuous power delivery to all loads even if one or more loads disconnect from the system, allowing for flexible reconfiguration without interrupting operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate power controllers are used for each heater, then each heater can be independently controlled, but the system complexity and cost increase significantly when reconfiguration is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple power controllers are electrically connected in parallel through cable assemblies, allowing them to share a common power source and control architecture. This merging approach enables reconfiguration of heater connections without adding or removing controllers, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cable assemblies are designed with universal connectors that can accommodate different heater configurations. The same cable assembly infrastructure supports various reconfiguration scenarios, making the system multi-functional and adaptable without requiring dedicated wiring for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate power controllers are used for each heater, then independent control is achieved, but the quantity of controllers and parts inventory increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheater configuration flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of power controllers
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple power controllers are electrically connected in parallel through cable assemblies, allowing them to share a common power source and control architecture. This merging approach enables reconfiguration of heater connections without adding or removing controllers, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If heaters are coupled directly to power controllers, then direct control is achieved, but reconfiguration requires significant rewiring and causes downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration easeVSAvoidreconfiguration downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses modular cable assemblies with standardized connectors that segment the electrical connections. This segmentation allows heaters to be disconnected and reconnected to different controllers by simply plugging and unplugging connectors, eliminating the need for rewiring and reducing reconfiguration downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cable assemblies are designed to be dynamically reconfigurable, allowing connections to be easily changed during operation. The flexible cable design and quick-connect interfaces enable operators to reconfigure heater assignments without shutting down the system, minimizing operational downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If direct coupling is used between power controllers and heaters, then simple connections are achieved, but the system lacks redundancy and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery reliabilityVSAvoidcable assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cable assemblies incorporate parallel electrical pathways at critical connection points, providing local redundancy without requiring complete system redesign. This localized approach to redundancy maintains overall system reliability while limiting the increase in cable assembly complexity to specific segments where it provides maximum benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8010811B2Power controller coupling assemblies and methods
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CO
  • US8010811B2 patent drawing
  • US8010811B2 patent drawing
  • US8010811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variety of power controller coupling assemblies are provided that include at least one power controller, at least one cable assembly coupled to the power controller, and a plurality of power loads coupled to the power controller and the cable assembly. Power is provided from the power controller to the power loads through the cable assembly in a configuration such that power is provided to each of the power loads if one or more of the power loads should become disconnected from the power controller coupling assembly. Additionally, various cable assemblies are provided that include a plurality of power cables connecting a plurality of connectors, each of the connectors defining a number of conductor positions for providing power from a power source to at least one power controller and to a plurality of power loads.