Power Effective Sensor Triggering for Mobile Traffic Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional participatory sensing systems for traffic condition monitoring on mobile devices face challenges in power consumption, particularly with high-power sensors like microphones and GPS, leading to inefficient battery usage and potential authenticity issues with data collection.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a power-effective sensor to monitor and control the operation of power-intensive sensors, such as using an accelerometer to analyze contextual information and trigger audio recording only when necessary, thereby reducing overall power consumption and ensuring data authenticity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power intensive sensors like microphone and GPS are continuously activated for traffic condition monitoring, then data collection comprehensiveness is improved, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection comprehensivenessVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously analyzing accelerometer data (low power) to detect contextual information indicating traffic events. When such events are detected, the system then activates power intensive sensors (microphone, GPS) only at those specific moments. This preliminary detection mechanism ensures comprehensive data collection is triggered only when necessary, resolving the contradiction between data comprehensiveness and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic action by continuously sampling accelerometer data at regular intervals to monitor for contextual changes. This periodic low-power monitoring is complemented by event-driven activation of high-power sensors only when contextual thresholds are exceeded. This periodic-check approach maintains data collection reliability while dramatically reducing overall power consumption compared to continuous high-power sensor operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If power effective sensors are continuously active to monitor contextual information, then triggering accuracy for high-power sensors is improved, but baseline power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetriggering accuracyVSAvoidbaseline power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The accelerometer serves as an intermediary sensor that continuously monitors contextual information with low power consumption. It acts as a gatekeeper that determines when power intensive sensors should be activated. This intermediary approach improves triggering accuracy by providing continuous contextual awareness while keeping baseline power consumption low, as the accelerometer consumes minimal power compared to microphone or GPS sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces direct mechanical/acoustic sensing (microphone) and satellite signal reception (GPS) with inertial sensing (accelerometer) for continuous monitoring. The accelerometer's mechanical simplicity allows continuous operation at very low power, substituting the need for continuous operation of more complex, power-intensive sensing mechanisms while maintaining the ability to trigger them accurately when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple sensors are activated simultaneously for rich sensing, then monitoring reliability is improved, but system complexity and power management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments sensor operation into distinct phases: continuous low-power accelerometer monitoring phase and event-driven high-power sensor activation phase. This segmentation allows multiple sensors to be used for reliable monitoring without requiring them to operate simultaneously. The accelerometer segment handles continuous contextual awareness, while microphone and GPS segments are activated only in specific event segments, reducing overall system complexity and power management burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic sensor activation where the operational state of each sensor changes based on contextual conditions. The accelerometer dynamically transitions between monitoring states, and power intensive sensors dynamically transition from idle to active states based on accelerometer-triggered events. This dynamic approach enables reliable multi-sensor monitoring while simplifying power management compared to static simultaneous activation, as sensors are activated only when contextually appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2981949B1System and method for power effective participatory sensing
Publication Date: 2018.11.14 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • EP2981949B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2981949B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2981949B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a method and system enabling power effective participatory sensing. The hand held device of the system is equipped with plurality of sensors, and is configured to enable the power effective sensor to monitor operation of the power intensive sensors. In one embodiment, a participatory sensing approach is used for traffic condition. A methodology for triggering power hungry sensors (audio) with the help of low power sensors (accelerometer) is presented which is able to reduce the overall power consumption of the mobile device. Further, a decision tree based approach is used to classify the level of congestion by measuring the horn density in a particular location.