Redistribution Power-Ground Layout for Flexible Chip Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power and ground networks in integrated circuit components, particularly in redistribution structures, lack flexibility due to the use of pre-designed macros that occupy entire chip areas, limiting the routing of other features.

Innovation Solution

Designing power-ground networks with pre-designed macros in upper layers and leaving lower layers free for other features, combined with redundant vias and a shortest-path scheme to reduce resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If pre-designed power-ground macros are used in redistribution structures, then design efficiency and ease of manufacture are improved, but design flexibility and area utilization deteriorate because entire chip areas are occupied and cannot be used for routing other features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The power-ground network is divided into two separate layers: upper layers contain pre-designed power-ground macros for ease of manufacture, while lower layers are freed for routing other features. This segmentation allows each layer to serve its specific function without interfering with the other, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing ease and design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves the power-ground macros to upper layers, utilizing the vertical dimension (layer stacking) to separate power-ground routing from signal routing. This dimensional separation allows both power-ground networks and other features to coexist in the same chip area without conflict, maintaining both manufacturing efficiency and design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If pre-designed power-ground macros are used, then manufacturing process is simplified, but chip area utilization worsens because the entire macro area cannot be used for other features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidchip area utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the power-ground network into upper layers (with macros) and lower layers (for other routing), the chip area is effectively utilized without conflict. The vertical separation allows maximum area usage while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution exploits the third dimension (vertical layering) to resolve the area conflict. Power-ground macros occupy upper layers while lower layers remain available for other features, achieving high chip area utilization without compromising manufacturing ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Power

If power-ground macros extend into lower layers, then power delivery is strengthened, but design flexibility deteriorates because lower layers cannot be used for other features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower deliveryVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The power-ground network is segmented into upper layers (containing macros for power delivery) and lower layers (freed for other routing). This segmentation ensures strong power delivery through dedicated upper layer macros while maintaining design flexibility in the lower layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By confining power-ground macros to upper layers and utilizing lower layers for other features, the solution achieves both strong power delivery (through dedicated upper layer macros) and design flexibility (through available lower layers), resolving the contradiction via vertical dimensionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If redundant vias and shortest-path scheme are implemented, then power path resistance is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower path resistanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The redundant vias and shortest-path routing are planned and implemented in advance during the design phase. This preliminary action ensures optimal power delivery paths are established before manufacturing, reducing resistance while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The solution optimizes the via density and routing paths by changing the structural parameters of the power-ground network. Redundant vias provide multiple parallel paths, effectively reducing resistance through parameter optimization rather than increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12400989B2Arrangement of power-grounds in package structures
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US12400989B2 patent drawing
  • US12400989B2 patent drawing
  • US12400989B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structure includes a redistribution structure, which includes a bottom layer and a plurality of upper layers over the bottom layer. The redistribution structure also includes a power-ground macro extending from a topmost layer in the plurality of upper layers to a bottommost layer in the plurality of upper layers, and a metal pad in the bottom layer and overlapped by the power-ground macro. The metal pad is electrically disconnected from the power-ground macro.