Power Semiconductor Module Alternating Current Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power semiconductor modules face challenges in reducing wiring inductance, leading to increased surge voltage, larger module size, higher costs, and external electromagnetic interference (EMI) due to insufficient inductance reduction in existing designs.

Innovation Solution

A power semiconductor module design featuring a first and second insulation substrate with conductor patterns and semiconductor elements connected in parallel, where current paths between positive and negative power supplies are aligned alternately along the conductor pattern's periphery, allowing surge currents to flow in opposing directions and cancel magnetic flux, thereby reducing wiring inductance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If wiring inductance is reduced to suppress surge voltage, then surge voltage is suppressed, but module size and cost increase due to larger semiconductor elements required for high withstand voltage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurge voltageVSAvoidmodule size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The current path is segmented into multiple parallel paths with alternating polarity arrangements. By dividing the single current path into multiple segments arranged in parallel, the patent reduces the effective inductance while distributing the surge voltage across multiple semiconductor elements, thereby suppressing overall surge voltage without requiring oversized individual elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric arrangement of positive and negative current paths in an alternating pattern around the conductor pattern. This asymmetric layout creates opposing magnetic fluxes that cancel each other, reducing net inductance and consequently suppressing surge voltage without increasing module size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-affected harmful factors

If wiring inductance is reduced to suppress surge voltage, then surge voltage is suppressed, but external EMI increases due to high voltage switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurge voltageVSAvoidexternal EMI
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the counterweight principle by arranging positive and negative current paths in close proximity with alternating polarity. The magnetic fields generated by these opposing currents act as counterweights that cancel each other out, reducing net electromagnetic radiation and external EMI while suppressing surge voltage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful high dv/dt switching behavior into a beneficial effect by utilizing the alternating current paths to generate opposing magnetic fluxes. The rapid voltage changes that would normally cause EMI are instead used to create canceling magnetic fields, transforming the harmful switching transient into a useful flux-cancellation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Device complexity

If conventional current path arrangement is used, then module design is simple, but wiring inductance remains high leading to increased surge voltage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent path arrangementVSAvoidsurge voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a conventional linear or radial current path arrangement to a two-dimensional alternating pattern around the conductor pattern. By utilizing the peripheral arrangement in multiple dimensions, the patent achieves superior inductance reduction while maintaining manageable design complexity through systematic repetition of the alternating pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively reduces wiring inductance by approximately half compared to conventional arrangements, suppressing surge voltage and external EMI, and allows for a more compact and cost-effective module without the need for excessive breakdown voltage.

Implementation Method 1

a surge current flows clockwise and counterclockwise, i.e. in both directions, when viewed from the thickness direction of the substrate. Accordingly, the magnetic flux by the current will cancel each other to allow reduction in the wiring inductance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux cancellation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8461623B2Power semiconductor module
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US8461623B2 patent drawing
  • US8461623B2 patent drawing
  • US8461623B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power semiconductor module (1) includes a first MOS transistor (16) connected to a positive side power supply terminal via a first conductor pattern (11), a first free wheeling diode (17) connected to the positive side power supply terminal via a second conductor pattern (12), a second MOS transistor (18) connected to a negative side power supply terminal via a third conductor pattern (13), and a second free wheeling diode (19) connected to the negative side power supply terminal via a fourth conductor pattern (14). These semiconductor elements (16-19) are connected to a load side output terminal via a common fifth conductor pattern (15). The semiconductor element (16, 17) connected to the positive side power supply terminal and the semiconductor element (18, 19) connected to the negative side power supply terminal are arranged alternately, substantially linearly.