Power Module Shutdown Control for Short-Circuit Hotspot Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor devices face damage from external short circuits due to excessive current, leading to localized heating and potential latchup, which conventional technologies fail to adequately address by either distributing switching losses near the gate or causing rapid voltage increase, resulting in reduced device lifetime.

Innovation Solution

Implementing device-level temperature and current sensing to predict temperature gains and control switching operations, distributing energy between regions to limit damage, using integrated thermal sense diodes and current sensors to measure and adjust current distribution, and employing an observer to model temperature effects and adjust the time rate of current change (dI/dt) to prevent latchup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the device is switched off rapidly to protect against external short circuit, then device protection is improved, but localized heating damage increases due to energy release

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice protectionVSAvoidlocalized heating
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the switching-off speed variable rather than fixed. The control system dynamically adjusts the switching-off speed based on real-time temperature measurements from multiple sensors. When temperature exceeds thresholds, the system automatically reduces switching-off speed to distribute energy release, preventing localized heating damage while still providing protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of switching-off speed from a constant value to a variable parameter that can be adjusted based on temperature conditions. By modifying this key parameter dynamically, the system resolves the contradiction between rapid switching for protection and controlled energy release to avoid heating damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If switching loss is distributed near the gate structure, then device lifetime is improved, but temperature control becomes difficult leading to potential latchup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice lifetimeVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using multiple temperature sensors positioned at critical locations including near the gate structure and in the bulk material. These sensors continuously monitor temperature and feed this information back to the control system, which then adjusts the switching-off speed in real-time to maintain temperature within safe limits while distributing switching loss to extend device lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by measuring temperature at multiple locations before switching operations occur and using these measurements to pre-determine the appropriate switching-off speed. This predictive approach allows the system to prevent temperature excursions before they cause latchup, while still achieving beneficial switching loss distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional switching-off methods are used, then simplicity is maintained, but device survivability from external short circuits is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching controlVSAvoiddevice survivability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces temperature sensors and a control system as intermediary elements between the external short circuit condition and the switching-off action. These intermediaries provide real-time temperature information and automatically adjust switching parameters, significantly improving device survivability without requiring complex external protection circuits or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces temperature hotspots, increases device lifetime, and improves survivability from external short circuits by efficiently distributing energy within the semiconductor device, minimizing damage and preventing latchup.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a temperature within a source region of the semiconductor device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 2

measuring at the semiconductor device an amount of current associated with a short circuit external to the semiconductor device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurrent measurement:

Implementation Method 3

When the device is switched off in response, energy release within the device may cause localized heating that may be substantial enough to damage the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10505528B1Deterministic shutdown of power module
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 APPLE INC
  • US10505528B1 patent drawing
  • US10505528B1 patent drawing
  • US10505528B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Power semiconductor devices according to embodiments of the present technology may be operated to protect components of the semiconductor device. Methods for operation of the devices may include measuring a temperature within a source region of the semiconductor device. The methods may include measuring at the semiconductor device an amount of current associated with a short circuit external to the semiconductor device. The methods may include predicting a temperature effect within two regions of the semiconductor device based on a range of distribution of the amount of current between the two regions of the semiconductor device. The methods may include determining a particular distribution of the amount of current between the two regions of the semiconductor device. The methods may also include shutting off the semiconductor device to cause the particular distribution of current between the two regions of the semiconductor device.