Power mop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mops suffer from uneven liquid application, inefficiency due to frequent repositioning for liquid, and lack of ergonomic design and adjustable spray capabilities, particularly in commercial settings.

Innovation Solution

A power mop with the pump, switch, and battery integrated into the hand grip, featuring a gravity-fed liquid system, ergonomic design, and adjustable nozzle for efficient liquid distribution, allowing for continuous use and varying spray patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional mops use a bucket for liquid storage, then the mop can be refilled easily, but the liquid application becomes uneven and requires frequent repositioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid application uniformityVSAvoidtime for repositioning to bucket
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The liquid storage system is segmented into a large tank for bulk storage and a smaller hand grip reservoir for active dispensing. This segmentation allows the main tank to be refilled easily while the hand grip provides continuous, controlled liquid application without requiring frequent stops at the liquid source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hand grip acts as an intermediary between the large tank and the floor surface. It contains a pump and valve system that delivers liquid in a controlled manner, ensuring uniform application while eliminating the need to repeatedly return to the large tank for refilling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the pump and controls are located in the hand grip, then the device becomes more ergonomic and compact, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic designVSAvoidintegration of pump and controls
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pump, valve, battery, and control switch are merged into a single integrated hand grip assembly. This consolidation improves ergonomics by placing all controls in one location and simplifies the overall system architecture, reducing the number of separate components and connections needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hand grip serves multiple functions: it stores liquid in its reservoir, houses the pump for pressurization, contains the valve for flow control, and provides the ergonomic interface for operation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and improves overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If a large tank is used for commercial applications, then sufficient liquid is available for large spaces, but the tank positioning must allow gravity-fed flow to the hand grip

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid storage capacityVSAvoidtank positioning and orientation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from horizontal liquid transfer to vertical gravity-fed flow by positioning the tank above the hand grip. This dimensional change allows the large tank to feed liquid to the hand grip reservoir using gravity alone, eliminating the need for additional pumping to overcome elevation differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The gravity-fed flow system creates a natural potential gradient from the elevated tank to the lower hand grip. By positioning the tank at a higher elevation, the system utilizes gravitational potential energy to drive liquid flow without requiring additional energy input or complex pumping mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Adaptability or versatility

If separate sprayer and tank devices are used, then each component can be optimized independently, but controlling multiple devices increases complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent optimizationVSAvoidcontrol of multiple devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tank, hand grip with pump and valve, and mop head are merged into a single integrated system. This eliminates the need to coordinate separate sprayer and tank devices, reducing operational complexity while maintaining the ability to optimize each component for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a compact, ergonomic, and efficient power mop capable of handling larger spaces with consistent liquid application and adjustable spray patterns, enhancing user experience and productivity.

Implementation Method 1

a battery for powering the pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBattery (electricity): Battery (electricity)

Implementation Method 2

a pump for providing flow pressure to the liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

a tank for holding a liquid positioned for gravity-induced flow of the liquid from a gravity feed conduit into a hand grip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

A nozzle is mounted on the handle tube to disperse the liquid onto the surface to be mopped

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid spray: Fluid Spray

Data Source

PatentUS10478038B1Power mop
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 WESSOL LLC
  • US10478038B1 patent drawing
  • US10478038B1 patent drawing
  • US10478038B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A power mop is provided having a tank for holding a liquid positioned for gravity-induced flow of the liquid from a gravity feed conduit into a hand grip. Inside of the hand grip is a liquid inlet, a valve for controlling the flow of the liquid, a pump for providing flow pressure to the liquid, and a battery for powering the pump. Additionally, a switch is accessible external to the hand grip for powering the pump and switching the valve between open and closed liquid flow positions. A handle tube is connected to the hand grip. The handle tube contains a pressure feed conduit for receiving pressurized flow of the liquid from the hand grip. A nozzle is mounted on the handle tube to disperse the liquid onto the surface to be mopped. A mop head is attached to the end of the handle tube remote from the hand grip.