Power Saving Mode Control in Image Forming Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming and reading apparatuses face challenges in efficiently switching between power saving and non-power saving modes, leading to increased user effort and reduced power conservation due to unpredictable mode changes and limited opportunities for power saving.

Innovation Solution

Implementing multiple stop conditions for mode switching, where the second condition is less likely to be satisfied than the first, allowing the apparatus to remain in power saving mode longer after user input, and incorporating user-settable conditions to enhance convenience and power conservation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the supply of power to the communication interface is cut in the power saving mode, then power consumption is reduced, but communication with external apparatus becomes unavailable and it is difficult to receive a job

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidease of receiving job
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The power supply control is segmented into different levels: the communication interface can be selectively powered off while other essential components remain powered. This allows the system to cut power to specific high-consumption modules (communication interface) while maintaining basic functionality, resolving the contradiction between power savings and operational availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by checking communication interface usage status before transitioning to power saving mode. It predicts future job reception needs and adjusts power supply accordingly, preventing unnecessary power cutoffs that would hinder job reception while still enabling power savings when communication is not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If the stop condition for changing to power saving mode is set to be easily satisfied, then the apparatus changes to power saving mode frequently and power consumption is reduced, but it takes a lot of time and effort for the user to input a job

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidtime and effort for user to input job
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by monitoring communication interface activity and predicting when jobs are likely to be received. It adjusts the stop condition satisfaction threshold based on these predictions, allowing more aggressive power saving when communication activity is low while preventing premature transitions when job reception is anticipated, thus reducing user inconvenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring communication interface status and user interaction patterns. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust the stop conditions for power saving mode transitions, ensuring that power savings are maximized without causing excessive user inconvenience from frequent mode changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the stop condition for changing to power saving mode is set to be less likely to be satisfied, then a chance to operate the apparatus in power saving mode is reduced, but it prevents frequent mode changes and reduces user effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operating apparatusVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The stop conditions are made dynamic rather than static. The system adjusts the satisfaction threshold of stop conditions based on real-time monitoring of communication interface usage and predicted job reception needs. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize between ease of operation and power consumption by making stop conditions easier to satisfy when power saving is beneficial and harder to satisfy when operational continuity is important.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2503396B1Image forming apparatus and image reading apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.02.19 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • EP2503396B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2503396B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2503396B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An image forming apparatus includes: a receiving unit; a printing unit; a power feed unit including a non-power saving mode and a power saving mode, the power feed unit configured to change the mode; an input unit configured to receive an input of a switching instruction; a switching unit configured to switch the mode from the non-power saving mode to the power saving mode when a stop condition is satisfied, the switching unit configured to switch the mode when the switching instruction is input; and a change unit configured to change the stop condition to a second condition which is more likely not to be satisfied than a first condition, after the mode is changed from the non-power saving mode to the power saving mode and when the mode is switched from the power saving mode to the non-power saving mode by the switching instruction.