Coordinating Control for Power Semiconductor Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High voltage and current power semiconductor switching devices face challenges in synchronized control due to noisy electrical environments, leading to a significant risk of device failure and cascading failures in systems where multiple devices are connected in series or parallel.

Innovation Solution

A coordinating control system that synchronizes the switching of multiple power semiconductor switching devices by controlling them through discrete states, including fully-off, saturated-on, and intermediate states, ensuring all devices reach a synchronized state before transitioning to the final state, using a central controller and sub-controllers with dedicated bus connections for efficient communication and fault detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If multiple power semiconductor switching devices are connected in series or parallel to operate at desired voltages and currents, then the system can handle high voltage and current loads, but the risk of device failure and cascading failures increases significantly due to noisy electrical environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage and current handling capabilityVSAvoiddevice failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the switching operation into multiple discrete intermediate states (e.g., partial conduction states) between fully-off and saturated-on. Each device transitions through these segmented states in a controlled sequence, allowing individual device monitoring and failure isolation without cascading effects to other devices in the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coordinating control system implements feedback mechanisms to monitor the state of each switching device during transitions through intermediate states. This feedback allows the system to detect device anomalies early, adjust control signals accordingly, and prevent failure propagation across the system, thereby improving reliability while maintaining high power handling capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If conventional switching control is used without intermediate states, then the control system is simpler, but synchronized switching of multiple devices is difficult to achieve in noisy electrical environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidsynchronized switching capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system prepares devices for synchronized switching by first transitioning them to intermediate states where they are partially conductive. This preliminary action allows the system to establish synchronized timing and monitoring before committing to full switching operations, improving synchronization reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The coordinating control system acts as an intermediary between individual device controllers and the power switching devices. It manages the transition through intermediate states and coordinates the timing signals, providing a structured approach to synchronization that balances control complexity with reliable synchronized operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If devices switch directly from fully-off to saturated-on states, then the switching speed is faster, but the current/voltage load is not balanced between devices and failure risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidload balancing and failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The switching operation is divided into periodic phases: transition through intermediate states, brief pause for synchronization verification, and then final switching to saturated-on state. This periodic structure allows load balancing checks at each phase transition while maintaining overall fast switching performance through optimized phase durations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically changes operating parameters during the switching process. Devices transition through intermediate conduction states with controlled current levels, allowing the system to balance load distribution across devices. The gate voltage and current parameters are adjusted progressively rather than abruptly, achieving both load balancing and acceptable switching speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2795779B1Switching control systems
Publication Date: 2016.11.23 MASCHFAB REINHAUSEN GMBH
  • EP2795779B1 patent drawingFigure 1~6a
  • EP2795779B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP2795779B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

We describe a system for controlling very large numbers of power semiconductor switching devices (132) to switch in synchronisation. The devices are high power devices, for example carrying hundreds of amps and/or voltages of the order of kilovolts. In outline the system comprises a coordinating control system (110, 120), which communicates with a plurality of switching device controllers (130) to control the devices into a plurality of states including a fully-off state, a saturated-on state, and at least one intermediate state between the fully-off and saturated-on states, synchronising the devices in the at least one intermediate state during switching.