Power Supply Management System with Dynamic Pricing for Load Leveling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power supply management systems struggle to effectively level power consumption across different time slots, particularly due to the fixed usage patterns of high power consumption loads like vehicle-mounted storage batteries, which limits the ability to shift power usage from high to low demand periods.

Innovation Solution

A power supply management system that sets distinct power fee unit prices for different electrical load devices, with a lower fee for high power consumption devices like vehicle-mounted storage batteries, to encourage usage during off-peak hours, and adjusts prices based on predicted load factors and excess solar-generated power to optimize transformer capacity and reduce waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single power fee unit price is set for all electrical load devices, then the system is simple to operate, but high power consumption loads cannot be effectively shifted to off-peak hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of power fee structureVSAvoideffectiveness of power consumption leveling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The power fee structure is segmented into different categories: a first power fee unit price for household electrical loads and a second power fee unit price for high power consumption loads. This segmentation allows differentiated pricing strategies for different types of appliances, enabling more effective load shifting for high power devices while maintaining simplicity for common household items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different power fee rates are applied to different types of electrical load devices based on their power consumption characteristics. High power consumption loads receive a second power fee unit price that is lower than the first power fee unit price applied to household electrical loads, creating localized pricing quality that matches the specific needs of each device category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the second power fee unit price is set lower than the first power fee unit price, then high power consumption loads are incentivized to run during off-peak hours, but the complexity of fee management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption leveling effectivenessVSAvoidcomplexity of power fee management system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fee management system is segmented into two distinct pricing categories with clear differentiation between household electrical loads and high power consumption loads. This segmentation simplifies management by creating discrete, easily identifiable fee structures rather than requiring complex continuous adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the power fee unit price parameter based on the type of electrical load device and time slot. By establishing predetermined parameters (first power fee for household loads, second power fee for high power loads), the system manages complexity through standardized parameter sets rather than ad-hoc pricing decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If power fees are adjusted based on predicted load factors and solar-generated power, then the system optimizes transformer capacity utilization, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformer capacity optimizationVSAvoidcomplexity of dynamic pricing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting load factors and solar-generated power in advance to set appropriate power fee unit prices before peak demand periods. This advance planning allows the system to optimize transformer capacity utilization by preparing pricing strategies that encourage load shifting, rather than reacting to conditions in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where power fee unit prices are adjusted based on predicted load factors and excess solar-generated power. This feedback loop allows the system to respond to grid conditions and renewable energy availability, optimizing transformer capacity while managing complexity through rule-based adjustments rather than fully dynamic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10559046B2Power supply management system
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10559046B2 patent drawing
  • US10559046B2 patent drawing
  • US10559046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power supply management system according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a fee setting unit configured to set power fee unit prices (first power fee unit price and second power fee unit price) for each time slot, and a notification unit configured to notify a consumer of information on the set power fee unit prices. The first power fee unit price is a power unit price for a household electrical load, and the second power fee unit price is a power unit price in a case of using a charge/discharge device to charge a vehicle-mounted storage battery. The fee setting unit is configured to set, by predicting a load factor of a transformer, a discount rate of the second power fee unit price to become higher (second power fee unit price to become lower) as the predicted load factor becomes lower. The second power fee unit price is determined on the basis of the first power fee unit price and the discount rate.