Power Supply Unit Controlled Shutdown Sequence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power supply units for electronic devices, particularly microprocessors, face challenges in reliably maintaining a predetermined turnoff sequence during shutdown processes, especially in environments with sudden voltage drops, which can lead to damage from voltage crossings.

Innovation Solution

A power supply unit with a power management section that actively decreases secondary voltages to a predetermined safety level in a controlled manner, allowing for simultaneous shutdown without safety time intervals and ensuring the predefined turnoff sequence is maintained, using mechanisms like pull-down means, DC-DC-converters, and feedback control to prevent voltage crossings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If secondary voltages are simply turned off during shutdown, then the shutdown process is simple, but voltage crossings may occur causing damage to electronic circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from voltage crossingsVSAvoidcomplexity of shutdown control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by actively pulling down secondary voltages to a predetermined safety level before complete shutdown. This pre-action ensures that voltages are in a safe state before the shutdown process completes, preventing voltage crossings that could damage electronic circuits while maintaining a controlled and reliable shutdown sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring the actual voltage levels during shutdown and adjusting the pull-down process accordingly. The power management section controls the decrease of secondary voltages based on feedback about their current state, ensuring that the turnoff sequence is maintained and voltages do not cross, thereby protecting electronic circuits without requiring overly complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If safety time intervals are provided between subsequent voltage turnoff processes, then voltage crossings are prevented, but the shutdown process takes a long period of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of voltage crossingsVSAvoidshutdown duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies continuity of useful action by actively and continuously pulling down secondary voltages during the shutdown process rather than simply disconnecting them. This continuous control ensures that voltages decrease in a managed sequence without crossing, eliminating the need for conservative safety time intervals and significantly reducing shutdown duration while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements rushing through the shutdown process by actively controlling the voltage decrease to occur rapidly and continuously. Instead of using slow, sequential turnoff with safety intervals, the system quickly pulls down voltages to the safety level while maintaining proper sequencing, thereby minimizing shutdown time without compromising protection against voltage crossings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Productivity

If secondary voltages are actively decreased to safety level in controlled manner, then shutdown speed is increased, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutdown speedVSAvoidcomplexity of voltage control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the voltage levels to decrease to a predetermined safety level during shutdown. This parameter-based approach allows for rapid and controlled voltage reduction without requiring complex control logic, as the system simply manages the voltage parameter to stay above the safety threshold while decreasing, thereby increasing shutdown speed without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If predetermined turnoff sequence is strictly maintained, then electronic circuits are protected, but the shutdown process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of electronic circuitsVSAvoidsimplicity of shutdown process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the power supply unit to automatically manage its own shutdown process. The power management section autonomously controls the decrease of secondary voltages to the safety level and maintains the proper turnoff sequence without requiring external intervention or complex coordination, thereby protecting electronic circuits while keeping the shutdown process simple to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4057108A1A power supply unit for an electronic device
Publication Date: 2022.09.14 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • EP4057108A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4057108A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4057108A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A power supply unit for an electronic device includes an input section comprising input terminals connectable to a primary power source, an output section comprising output terminals connectable to the electronic device and outputting at least two secondary voltages having different nominal voltage levels, and a power management section. The power management section is configured to perform a shutdown process upon existence of a shutdown criterion, wherein the emergency shutdown process comprises decreasing each of the secondary voltages down to a predetermined safety level in a controlled manner.