Power Switch Reverse Current Blocking Circuit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power switches lack effective reverse current blocking capability, which is essential for protecting both the load and power sources in electronic systems.

Innovation Solution

A reverse current blocking (RCB) circuit is designed using N-channel MOS transistors, charge pumps, amplifiers, current sensing circuits, and multiplier circuits to control current flow, ensuring that current only flows in one direction by utilizing feedback loops and exponential current sinks to maintain a conductive path when the input voltage is higher than the output voltage and blocking current when the output is higher.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional power switches are used to control power delivery, then basic current limiting is achieved, but reverse current blocking capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverse current blocking capabilityVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power switch is divided into two separate transistors (first transistor and second transistor) with distinct functions: the first transistor handles forward current conduction while the second transistor blocks reverse current. This segmentation allows each transistor to be optimized for its specific function, achieving reliable reverse current blocking without requiring a completely different device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Charge pumps are introduced as intermediary devices to generate the necessary gate voltages for both transistors. The charge pumps mediate between the input voltage and the gate terminals, providing the precise voltage control needed for reliable reverse current blocking while maintaining a relatively simple overall circuit structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If reverse current blocking is implemented using additional transistors and control circuits, then protection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The first transistor serves multiple functions: it conducts forward current during normal operation and also contributes to reverse current blocking when combined with the second transistor. The charge pumps also serve dual purposes by providing gate drive voltages for their respective transistors and inherently providing voltage multiplication for reverse blocking. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated protection components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The amplifier circuit provides feedback control by monitoring the voltage across the transistors and adjusting the charge pump operation accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable reverse current blocking while allowing the use of standard transistors and charge pumps rather than requiring specialized high-complexity protection devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If charge pumps are used to control transistor gates, then current conduction control is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent control precisionVSAvoidcharge pump energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The charge pumps operate in a periodic manner, switching between charging and discharging states synchronized with the switching cycle of the power switch. During the off-state, the charge pumps are discharged through the amplifier and feedback circuitry rather than remaining continuously charged. This periodic operation significantly reduces average energy consumption while maintaining precise current control during the on-state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The amplifier circuit provides feedback control that monitors the voltage across the transistors and dynamically adjusts the charge pump operation. This feedback ensures that the charge pumps only consume energy when necessary for maintaining proper transistor operation, rather than continuously consuming power. The feedback mechanism optimizes the balance between control precision and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9077190B2Power switch with reverse current blocking capability
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 DECICON A CALIFORNIA CORP
  • US9077190B2 patent drawing
  • US9077190B2 patent drawing
  • US9077190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A switching circuit controls the flow of current between its input and output in accordance with the state of a control signal applied to the circuit. When the control signal is in a first state and the voltage applied to the input is higher than the voltage at the output, the circuit provides a low resistance path between its input and output terminals thereby enabling current to flow from the input to the output. When the control signal is in the first state and the voltage at the output is higher than the voltage at the input, the circuit inhibits current flow from the output to the input. When the control signal is in a second state, the circuit is turned off thus inhibiting current flow between the input and the output.