Power Tool Chuck with Two-Stage Clamping for Higher Bit Holding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power tool chucks suffer from insufficient holding force on tool bits and increased overall axial length, which affects the efficiency and usability of power tools.

Innovation Solution

A power tool chuck design featuring a chuck body with a longitudinal bore and radial slots, incorporating jaw assemblies and a clamping ring with distinct clamping interfaces. The clamping ring and jaw assemblies work together to apply a first clamping force followed by a second, greater force, utilizing different angles and a detent mechanism to enhance holding capability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If existing chuck designs are used, then the structure is simple, but the holding force on tool bits is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidchuck structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chuck is divided into multiple functional components: a body, a rotatable clamping ring, and multiple jaw assemblies. Each component performs a specific function, with the clamping ring providing rotational control and the jaw assemblies providing clamping force through inclined surfaces. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high holding force while maintaining manageable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The jaw assemblies incorporate inclined surfaces that convert the rotational motion of the clamping ring into radial clamping motion. The curved geometry of these inclined surfaces enables smooth, progressive engagement of the jaws with the tool bit, maximizing holding force through mechanical advantage while keeping the overall structure compact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Length of moving object

If existing chuck designs are used, then the manufacturing is straightforward, but the overall axial length is significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial lengthVSAvoidchuck manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The jaw assemblies are nested within radial slots in the chuck body, and the clamping ring is received over the body and jaw assemblies. This nested arrangement allows all components to occupy a compact axial space, significantly reducing the overall axial length of the chuck while maintaining ease of manufacture through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of extending the clamping mechanism axially, the invention utilizes radial dimensions by positioning jaw assemblies in radial slots and employing inclined surfaces that act in the radial direction. This dimensional shift reduces axial length while achieving the required clamping function through radial engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a single-stage clamping mechanism is used, then the structure is simple, but the holding capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding capabilityVSAvoidclamping mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The jaw assemblies are pre-positioned in radial slots with inclined surfaces that are already configured to engage the tool bit. As the clamping ring rotates, the inclined surfaces automatically guide the jaws into proper engagement position and apply clamping force progressively, ensuring reliable holding capability without requiring complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves improved holding force and reduced axial length, enhancing the performance and usability of power tools by securely retaining tool bits and minimizing the tool's overall length.

Implementation Method 1

The clamping ring and each jaw assembly together define a first clamping interface configured to cause the jaw assembly to clamp the tool bit a first clamping force up to a first maximum clamping force during a first phase of clamping, and a second clamping interface configured to cause the jaw assembly to clamp the tool bit at a second clamping force that is greater than the first maximum clamping force during a second phase of clamping.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS12290864B2Power tool chuck
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US12290864B2 patent drawing
  • US12290864B2 patent drawing
  • US12290864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chuck including a chuck body that supports a plurality of jaws. An outer sleeve is axially fixed with respect to the chuck body. A nut is coupled to the outer sleeve, and the nut is movable axially and radially relative to the chuck body. The nut interacts with the jaws such that when the outer sleeve rotates, the nut moves axially and radially relative to the body.