Power Tool Accident Prevention via Visual Hazard Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional safety techniques for power tools do not effectively prevent accidents by detecting potential hazards before they occur, relying mainly on flesh proximity detection and failing to address causes like user ineptitude, distraction, fatigue, and improper setup.

Innovation Solution

A system combining visual information from static and wearable cameras with cognitive data from wearables to identify potential accident causes and activate emergency safety measures, such as cutting power to the tool or providing alerts, to prevent accidents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional flesh proximity detection is used, then the system can detect immediate dangers, but it cannot prevent accidents before they occur or address root causes like user distraction and fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident prevention capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of accident risks by analyzing images from static and wearable cameras to identify dangerous situations before they escalate into actual accidents. The danger identification circuit processes visual data to detect potential hazards such as improper tool operation, unsafe environments, or user distress signals, enabling preventive action before contact with rotating blades occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The safety system is segmented into multiple independent detection components: static cameras monitoring the environment, wearable cameras on the user, and a centralized danger identification circuit. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific detection tasks while maintaining overall system manageability and reducing the complexity burden of comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multiple cameras and cognitive sensors are integrated, then comprehensive accident risk detection is achieved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident risk detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensors and processing circuits
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wearable camera serves multiple functions: it monitors user facial expressions for distress detection, captures first-person views of tool operation, and provides continuous visual feedback to the danger identification circuit. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized sensors, thereby improving detection accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The danger identification circuit acts as an intermediary that receives and processes data from multiple sources (static cameras, wearable cameras, and cognitive sensors). It consolidates information from these diverse inputs, performs unified analysis, and generates coherent safety decisions, thereby managing the complexity of integrating multiple sensors through a centralized processing layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If real-time image analysis is performed to identify inherent dangers, then potential accident causes are detected early, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveearly hazard detectionVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of images to identify inherent dangers such as improper tool setup, unsafe environmental conditions, or user positioning risks before these develop into immediate threats. By detecting and flagging these potential hazards in advance, the system enables preventive corrections without requiring intensive real-time processing during critical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The danger identification circuit prioritizes processing by skipping less critical analysis steps when immediate hazards are detected. When the system identifies urgent threats such as user distress or dangerous tool operation, it rushes through the analysis pipeline to provide rapid warnings, thereby reducing processing delay for critical safety events while maintaining thorough analysis for less urgent conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS10303126B2System, method, and recording medium for power tool accident prevention
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10303126B2 patent drawing
  • US10303126B2 patent drawing
  • US10303126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power tool accident prevention method, system, and non-transitory computer readable medium receiving images from a static camera of a setup or operation of a power tool, include a danger identification circuit configured to: analyze the images to identify inherent dangers in the setup or the operation of the power tool, and identify at least one potential cause of an accident based on the identified inherent dangers, and a power tool disabling circuit configured to activate an emergency safety measure of the power tool to avoid the at least one potential cause of the accident.