Power Tool Communication Protocol for Cross-Platform Firmware Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power tools and devices lack a universal communication protocol that can efficiently facilitate data exchange and firmware installation across various power platforms, leading to complex and costly development and maintenance of separate communication systems for each tool type.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a universal protocol system with a generic universal core module and interface modules tailored to specific tool types, enabling translation between different communication protocols and power platforms, thereby simplifying data exchange and firmware installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate communication systems are developed for each power tool type, then communication compatibility for each specific tool is ensured, but development cost and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication compatibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal communication protocol that enables a single communication system to work across multiple power tool types and platforms. The protocol defines standardized message formats, data structures, and communication rules that can be applied universally, eliminating the need for separate communication systems for each tool type while maintaining reliability through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The communication system is segmented into distinct layers including a universal protocol layer and implementation-specific adaptation layers. This segmentation allows the core communication framework to remain simple and universal while handling tool-specific variations through modular adaptation modules, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate communication systems are developed for each power tool type, then specific tool communication requirements are met, but development time and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool-specific communication requirementsVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a preliminary universal communication framework that defines core protocols, message formats, and data structures in advance. This preliminary action creates a reusable foundation that can be rapidly adapted to specific tool types without requiring complete system redesign, significantly reducing development time for new tool implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The universal protocol acts as an intermediary layer between the communication infrastructure and tool-specific implementations. This mediator enables standardized communication patterns to be applied across different tool types while allowing tool-specific requirements to be handled through adaptation modules, reducing both development time and maintenance complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a universal protocol is implemented across diverse power tools, then development cost and system complexity are reduced, but communication compatibility across different tool types must be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidcommunication compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing tool-specific adaptation modules to handle platform-specific variations while the universal protocol handles common communication requirements. This enables the system to maintain simplicity through standardization while ensuring compatibility through localized adaptation where needed, balancing reduced complexity with maintained reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If tool-specific communication protocols are used, then precise control for each tool type is achieved, but interoperability and data exchange between different tool types become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool control precisionVSAvoidinteroperability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The universal protocol serves as an intermediary that enables interoperability between different tool types while preserving tool-specific control capabilities. Standardized message formats and data structures allow different tools to communicate effectively, while adaptation modules ensure that tool-specific control requirements are met through protocol-compliant implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12350807B2Universal protocol for power tools
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US12350807B2 patent drawing
  • US12350807B2 patent drawing
  • US12350807B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for communicating between motorized power tools includes establishing, using a physical interface of a first power tool, a wireless radio link between the first power tool and a second power tool. The first power tool has a first motor and the second power tool has a second motor. A signal is received over the wireless radio link, via the physical interface, at the first power tool from the second power tool using a first wireless communication protocol. The signal includes an identifier. The second power tool is verified as authorized to send the signal to the first power tool based on the identifier. A tool component of the first power tool is controlled responsive to the signal.