Power Tool Activation Control with Timer-Based Safety Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power tools often lack effective mechanisms to ensure safe and efficient activation, particularly in scenarios where unintended activation could pose safety hazards, and there is a need for managing power modes to conserve energy and reduce noise.

Innovation Solution

A control module, such as a programmable logic controller, manages the activation and power states of power tools by implementing a timer-based logic flow that automatically deactivates the tool after a set period of inactivity, with user-configurable options and visual/audible alerts to indicate active and inactive states, allowing for seamless reactivation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If power tools are designed to activate immediately when powered (battery attached or plugged in), then ease of operation is improved, but safety risks increase due to unintended activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of activationVSAvoidsafety hazards from unintended activation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by implementing a delay period and requiring a second activation input before the tool actually activates. This preliminary verification step prevents unintended activation while maintaining ease of use, as the user simply needs to press the activation control twice within a specified time window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control module provides visual feedback through LEDs to indicate the tool's activation state and readiness. The system monitors and responds to user inputs by providing immediate visual confirmation, helping users understand the system's state and preventing unintended activation through clear status indication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If power tools operate in full power mode continuously, then productivity is improved, but energy consumption increases reducing battery runtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool performanceVSAvoidbattery energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the power tool's operating mode based on real-time conditions. The control module can switch between full power mode and reduced power mode, allowing the tool to optimize performance based on battery status, operational needs, and user preferences, thereby balancing productivity with energy conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by implementing different power modes (full power and reduced power). This allows the tool to adapt its performance characteristics and energy consumption based on the situation, extending battery runtime when full power is not continuously required while maintaining high productivity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If power tools operate in full power mode, then productivity is improved, but noise levels increase which is problematic in noise-sensitive environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool performanceVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational characteristics by switching between full power mode and reduced power mode. This allows the tool to operate quietly in noise-sensitive environments when full power is not required, while maintaining high productivity capabilities when needed, effectively managing noise as a variable parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If power tools require multiple activation steps to prevent unintended activation, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against unintended activationVSAvoidactivation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a preliminary verification step requiring a second activation input within a specified time window after the first input. This preliminary check enhances safety by confirming user intent while maintaining ease of operation, as the additional step is simple and intuitive (pressing the same control again) rather than complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11075531B2Power tool activation control systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.07.27 OREGON TOOL INC
  • US11075531B2 patent drawing
  • US11075531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments herein describe methods and systems for controlling the power state of a tool. A tool is placed into an active mode upon initial power up, as typically indicated by one or more indicators. The tool is automatically placed into an inactive mode upon the expiration of a timer, if the tool motor was not activated. If the tool is activated, such as by pressing the tool switch, prior to expiration of the timer, the timer resets. A display is provided to signal the user as to the current active status and/or current mode of the tool.