Power Tool Touch Sensing for Two-Hand Activation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power tools lack effective mechanisms to distinguish between a user's hand and other objects, leading to potential false activations and safety hazards due to factors like water, dirt, or debris, and do not ensure both hands are securely gripping the tool before operation.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of impedance or capacitive touch sensors on multiple handles to detect the presence of a user's hands, with a controller ensuring both hands are detected before allowing tool operation, and distinguishing between human hands and inanimate objects based on impedance or capacitance changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional activation mechanisms are used, then the tool can be activated easily, but false activations occur due to water, dirt, or debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool activationVSAvoidfalse activation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical activation mechanisms (triggers, switches) with capacitive touch sensors that detect the electrical properties of human skin. This substitution allows the system to distinguish between human hands and inanimate objects like water or dirt, which have different capacitance characteristics, thereby preventing false activations while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in electrical capacitance and impedance parameters when a human hand contacts the sensor surface. By monitoring these parameter changes and comparing them against predefined thresholds, the system can reliably detect human presence and differentiate it from environmental contaminants, resolving the contradiction between ease of activation and false activation resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If no hand detection mechanism is used, then the tool can be operated freely, but safety hazards occur without proper hand grip

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation freedomVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary hand detection through capacitive sensors before allowing tool operation. The system continuously monitors for the presence of human hands on designated grip areas before enabling activation, ensuring that users are properly positioned and aware of the tool's operation, thereby preventing safety hazards while maintaining operational freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the capacitive sensors continuously provide information about hand presence to the control system. This real-time feedback allows the system to dynamically adjust operation permissions based on detected hand positions, ensuring safety requirements are met while preserving user freedom to operate the tool when conditions are appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If single hand detection is used, then the tool can be operated with one hand, but safety is reduced compared to two-hand operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveone-hand operationVSAvoidsafety control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the hand detection system into multiple independent capacitive sensor zones, each capable of detecting hand presence separately. This segmentation allows the system to require activation of multiple zones (corresponding to multiple hands) for full operation permission, providing enhanced safety control while still allowing flexible operation modes including one-hand operation when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety by preventing tool activation without proper hand grip and reducing false activations, ensuring secure and controlled operation.

Implementation Method 1

The second handle includes a touch sensor (e.g., a capacitive touch sensor, an inductive touch sensor). The touch sensor is configured to detect a second hand of the user on the second handle.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

the power tool includes one or more impedance sensors that can be used to detect when a user is gripping one or more handles or surfaces of the power tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance sensing: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentEP4327985B1Power tool including a touch sensor
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • EP4327985B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4327985B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4327985B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Systems and methods for power tools having touch sensors. One power tool includes a housing (100), a motor (200), a first handle (110), a second handle (115), and a controller (300). The first handle includes a user input configured to be actuated by a first hand of a user. The second handle includes a touch sensor configured to detect a second hand of the user on the second handle. The controller is configured to determine whether the user input is actuated, determine whether the second hand of the user is on the second handle, control, in response to both the user input being actuated and the second hand of the user being on the second handle, the motor to drive the motor, and prohibit, in response to the user input being actuated and the second hand of the user not being on the second handle, operation of the motor.