Powered Door Control with Occupant and Passerby Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle-powered door systems lack effective control mechanisms that consider the location of occupants and passerby, potentially leading to interference or obstruction during door operation.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with interior and exterior sensors to detect occupant movement and passerby proximity, controlling powered doors to prevent closure when an occupant is exiting and to partially or fully open the door based on passerby presence, using actuators like electric motors and brake devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the powered door is controlled to open fully when an occupant intends to exit, then occupant egress is facilitated, but passerby obstruction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant egressVSAvoidpasserby obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The door control system dynamically adjusts the door position based on real-time sensor inputs. When an occupant intends to exit, the door opens to a first position that facilitates egress. When a passerby is detected, the system dynamically repositions the door to a second position that clears the swing path, preventing obstruction while maintaining accessibility for the occupant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the door environment using sensors that detect both interior occupants and exterior passbys. This feedback loop enables the controller to adjust door position in real-time based on the detected presence of occupants and passbys, resolving the contradiction between facilitating exit and preventing obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the powered door is controlled to close when no occupant is exiting, then security is improved, but occupant entrapment risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoccupant entrapment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of occupant exit intentions before initiating door closure. Interior sensors monitor occupant position and movement to determine exit intent. Only when no exit intent is detected does the system proceed with closing the door, thereby preventing entrapment while maintaining security through timely closure when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously receives feedback from interior sensors monitoring occupant presence and exit intentions. This feedback prevents premature or erroneous closure by detecting when an occupant intends to exit, thereby eliminating entrapment risk while maintaining security through controlled closure when the interior is clear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If the door actuator operates at high speed, then door response time is reduced, but control precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor response timeVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator operates dynamically with varying speeds based on the control phase. During rapid response scenarios (such as detecting a passerby requiring immediate door closure), the actuator operates at high speed to minimize response time. During positioning and precision control phases, the actuator operates at reduced speed to achieve precise door positioning at the required angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator employs periodic control cycles that alternate between rapid movement phases and precise positioning phases. This periodic action allows the system to achieve both fast response time during transition phases and precise control during positioning phases, resolving the contradiction between speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240151092A1Vehicle having door closure control
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US20240151092A1 patent drawing
  • US20240151092A1 patent drawing
  • US20240151092A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a cabin interior, a powered door having an actuator for moving the door between closed and open positions, interior sensors sensing position or movement of an occupant in the cabin interior, and exterior sensors sensing a passerby proximate to the vehicle. The vehicle includes a controller determining an occupant intending to exit the vehicle via the door based on the interior sensors and determining a passerby passing by the door in an open position using the at least one exterior sensors. The controller controls the actuator to open the door when the occupant is intended to exit the vehicle and at least partially closes the door when a passerby is detected passing by the vehicle door and an occupant is determined not to be exiting the vehicle. The controller controls the actuator to open the door further when the passerby is determined to pass by the door.