Powered Hammer Rod Attachment with Angled Side-Load Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for driving long metal ground rods into the ground using powered hammers are inefficient and require multiple attachments, leading to increased time and effort.

Innovation Solution

An attachment for powered hammers featuring a body with an impact portion and a driving portion, including a side load driving axis angled relative to the impact axis, a one-way collet, and a retention device to secure the drive shank, allowing efficient driving of rods without the need for multiple attachments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional methods are used to drive ground rods, then multiple attachments are required, but this increases time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving speedVSAvoidtime to drive rod
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the impact portion and driving portion into a single integrated attachment, eliminating the need for multiple separate attachments. The impact portion receives blows from the powered hammer while the driving portion engages the rod, merging two functional components into one unified device that performs both impact transmission and rod engagement simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment is designed with universal functionality to handle both the impact transmission and rod engagement functions through a single device. The body structure serves multiple purposes: providing structural support, transmitting impact forces, engaging the rod, and accommodating the drive shank, thereby eliminating the need for multiple specialized attachments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the drive shank is securely locked in the bore, then reliability is improved, but axial movement is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring of drive shankVSAvoidaxial movement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be dynamic rather than static. It provides secure locking during normal operation to prevent shank displacement, but allows controlled axial movement when needed for shank replacement or adjustment. The mechanism transitions between locked and unlocked states based on operational requirements, balancing security with operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism acts as an intermediary between the drive shank and the bore. It provides a controlled interface that allows the shank to be securely held during operation while enabling easy removal and replacement when required, mediating between the conflicting requirements of security and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the driving force is transmitted directly to the rod, then productivity is improved, but marring and fatigue increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving efficiencyVSAvoidmarring and fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The driving portion is designed with specific local characteristics to distribute the driving force. The geometry and material properties of the driving portion are optimized to concentrate forces at appropriate locations on the rod while distributing loads to prevent localized damage, marring, or fatigue at critical stress points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The attachment significantly reduces driving time by over half compared to traditional methods, enhances rod engagement, and minimizes marring and fatigue, while allowing for quick shank replacement.

Implementation Method 1

The one-way collet is configured to transmit a driving force generated by impacts from the powered hammer to the rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

The driving portion further includes a biasing member disposed between the collet and the end cap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250262738A1Attachment for powered hammer
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US20250262738A1 patent drawing
  • US20250262738A1 patent drawing
  • US20250262738A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An attachment configured for use with a powered hammer to drive a rod into the ground includes a body and an impact portion defining an impact axis. The impact portion includes a bore configured to receive a drive shank that is coupled to the powered hammer. The impact portion is configured to receive repeated impacts from the powered hammer. The attachment also includes a driving portion in which the rod is receivable. The driving portion includes a side load driving portion defining a side load driving axis. The side load driving axis is non-parallel to the impact axis.