Powered Lower Limb Orthosis Control for Autonomous Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current powered assistive devices for individuals with paraplegia require significant upper body strength, are cumbersome, and lack intuitive control methods, leading to inefficient mobility and associated physiological impairments.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, wearable powered lower limb orthosis with a novel control architecture that uses eight measurable angles to autonomously control sitting, standing, and walking without external assistance, incorporating functional electrical stimulation and a distributed embedded system for intuitive user control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If passive orthoses are used to restore legged mobility, then mobility is improved, but upper body strength requirements and physical exertion increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewalking speedVSAvoidupper body strength requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical passive orthosis system with a powered system that uses electric motors to generate the forces needed for hip extension and knee flexion. This substitution of mechanical systems with powered actuation eliminates the need for users to generate large upper body forces, directly resolving the contradiction between mobility improvement and upper body strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If powered orthoses with multiple motors are used to assist locomotion, then gait speed increases, but device mass and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegait speedVSAvoidorthosis mass
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the powered orthosis into modular segments with dedicated actuators at each joint (hip and knee). Each motor unit is independently controlled and optimized for its specific function. This segmentation allows the system to achieve improved gait speed through coordinated multi-joint actuation while keeping individual component masses manageable and allowing for selective activation to reduce overall system weight during different phases of gait.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Extent of automation

If complex control systems are implemented in powered orthoses, then autonomous movement is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous control capabilityVSAvoiduser control simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a control system that autonomously manages the complex coordination of multiple motors and actuation phases without requiring direct user intervention. The system self-regulates motor commands, timing sequences, and force levels based on predefined gait patterns and sensor feedback, enabling autonomous bipedal locomotion while maintaining ease of operation through minimal user input requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If reciprocal hip coupling mechanisms are used to increase stride length, then gait efficiency improves, but device complexity and mechanical constraints increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegait efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical coupling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical reciprocal coupling mechanisms with independent powered actuation at each hip joint. Electric motors and electronic control systems substitute for mechanical linkages, cables, and hydraulic circuits. This substitution maintains gait efficiency through coordinated control of bilateral hip extension while dramatically reducing mechanical complexity, eliminating the need for physical coupling between left and right hip mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and autonomous legged mobility with reduced physiological impairments, lower energy expenditure, and improved gait speed, allowing users to walk and stand with minimal assistance, thereby addressing the limitations of existing devices.

Implementation Method 1

incorporating functional electrical stimulation and a distributed embedded system for intuitive user control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFunctional electrical stimulation: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS10792210B2Movement assistance device
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 VANDERBILT UNIV
  • US10792210B2 patent drawing
  • US10792210B2 patent drawing
  • US10792210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A apparatus includes an a exoskeleton system with a plurality of sensors for generating signals indicating a current motion and a current arrangement of at least the exoskeleton system, a hip segment, and at least one lower limb. The lower limb includes thigh and shank segments for coupling to a lateral surface of a user's leg. The thigh segment includes a first powered joint coupling the thigh segment to the hip segment, a second powered joint coupling the thigh segment to the shank segment, and a controller coupled to the sensors, the first powered joint, and the second powered joint. The controller is configured for determining a current state of the exoskeleton system and a current intent of the user based on the signals and generating control signals for the first and second powered joints based on the current state and the current intent.