Powertrain Control Unit for Location-Based Emissions Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing powertrains struggle to minimize the impact of emissions, particularly criteria pollutants like soot and NOx, which vary by location and time, requiring a dynamic control system to adjust pollutant ratios and reduce environmental health risks.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid powertrain system that dynamically controls engine operating conditions, combines electric motors with engines, and employs an aftertreatment system with substrates and catalysts to reduce pollutant concentrations, using energy storage devices and location-specific demand calculations to optimize emissions reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the engine operates to minimize fuel consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but pollutant emissions (soot, NOx) increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidpollutant emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts engine operating conditions and powertrain configuration based on real-time location data, time of day, and environmental conditions. The control system continuously optimizes the balance between fuel efficiency and emissions by selecting appropriate operating modes (e.g., electric-only, hybrid, or combustion) and adjusting engine parameters such as injection timing and air-fuel ratio according to the specific environmental context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key operating parameters including power distribution between motor and engine, engine load, injection timing, and air-fuel mixture composition based on location-specific environmental conditions. These parameter adjustments allow the system to shift between minimizing fuel consumption and minimizing harmful emissions depending on the operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the system reduces harmful pollutants in high-population areas, then environmental health impact is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental health impactVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions including location-based environmental assessment, real-time emissions monitoring, powertrain optimization, and aftertreatment control into a single unified system. This multi-functional approach manages complexity by consolidating control logic rather than requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors emissions data, location information, and operational parameters, then uses this feedback to dynamically adjust powertrain control strategies. The feedback loop enables the system to adapt to changing environmental conditions and optimize emissions reduction effectiveness without requiring manual intervention or overly complex pre-programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the aftertreatment system is activated to reduce pollutant concentrations, then emissions are reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollutant concentrationsVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates the aftertreatment system in advance before the vehicle enters high-population or environmentally sensitive areas. By pre-heating catalysts and preparing emission control components, the system ensures immediate emissions reduction capability upon entering sensitive zones without requiring excessive energy input during actual operation in those areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The aftertreatment system operates periodically or intermittently based on location and environmental conditions rather than continuously. The control system activates emission reduction measures only when the vehicle is in or approaching areas where pollutant reduction provides maximum benefit, thereby minimizing unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining effective emissions control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the overall emissions impact by adjusting pollutant ratios and concentrations, minimizing harmful pollutants in high-population areas and reducing short-term emission spikes, while maintaining efficient energy use.

Implementation Method 1

employs an aftertreatment system with substrates and catalysts to reduce pollutant concentrations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS11560863B1Powertrain control unit that controls pollutants according to engine location, and a vehicle or equipment comprising the powertrain control unit
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 BRESBO AB
  • US11560863B1 patent drawing
  • US11560863B1 patent drawing
  • US11560863B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A powertrain control unit may be configured to control an engine and identify a first operating condition is expected to fulfill a demand for output with an exhaust stream having a first amount of a pollutant (e.g., NOx, particulate matter), and a second operating condition expected to fulfill the demand with an exhaust stream having a reduced amount of the pollutant as compared to the first amount. The powertrain control unit may receive duty cycle information to control the engine to fulfill the demand per the second operating condition, yielding the reduced amount of pollutant in the exhaust. Duty cycle information may include speed, location, position, rotation, temperature, and/or other information. A vehicle, backhoe, bulldozer, crane, and/or combine harvester may comprise the powertrain control unit and an engine and aftertreatment system. An exhaust aftertreatment system may be remotely activated, which may reduce warmup time associated with emissions mitigation.