Powertrain Control Strategy for Automatic Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for powertrain systems in machines like wheel loaders and dozers rely heavily on operator discretion, leading to inefficient operation and lack of automatic mode selection, resulting in suboptimal performance and fuel efficiency during different work cycles.

Innovation Solution

A control system that includes sensors for ground speed and engine load, an operational state determination module, and a controller that adjusts engine speed and transmission torque commands based on the operational state of the machine to automatically switch between economy and performance modes, ensuring the powertrain output meets or is less than the operator's request.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If operator manually enters operational mode in control system, then machine can perform different operations, but operator discretion and experience make it cumbersome and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational mode selectionVSAvoidoperator effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically determines operational state and selects appropriate operational modes without requiring manual operator input. The system monitors sensor data (ground speed, engine load, implement position) and autonomously switches between modes such as economy mode and performance mode, allowing the machine to serve itself in mode selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual operator decision-making with an automated electronic control system that uses sensor data and pre-programmed logic to determine operational modes. This substitution of mechanical/manual operation with electronic automation eliminates the need for operator discretion while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If operator manually controls operational mode, then machine operation can be adjusted, but operator may not put in effort and operate in single mode only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational mode varietyVSAvoidwork cycle efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors multiple sensor inputs including ground speed, engine load, and implement position to determine the current operational state. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts operational modes to match the actual work cycle phase, ensuring optimal performance throughout dig, transport, and dump operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The operational mode is made dynamic rather than static, automatically changing based on real-time operational conditions. The system transitions between different operational modes (economy, performance, etc.) as the machine moves through different phases of the work cycle, optimizing performance for each specific operational phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If fuel injection timing is optimized for complete combustion, then fuel efficiency improves, but engine performance tradeoff occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidengine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts engine operating parameters including fuel injection timing, engine speed limits, and torque limits based on the determined operational state. During economy mode, parameters are optimized for fuel efficiency with retarded injection timing and reduced engine speed limits. During performance mode, parameters are adjusted for maximum power output with advanced injection timing and higher engine speed limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10029694B2Control strategy for a powertrain system
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US10029694B2 patent drawing
  • US10029694B2 patent drawing
  • US10029694B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for a powertrain in a machine includes a first sensor which generates a first signal indicative of a ground speed of the machine. The control system includes a second sensor which generates a second signal indicative of a load of an engine in the powertrain. The control system includes a third sensor which generates a third signal indicative of an operational state of the machine. The control system includes an input device which enables an operator to generate a request for a powertrain output. The control system further includes a controller in communication with the first sensor, the second sensor, the third sensor and the input device. The controller determines an engine speed command and a transmission output torque command to produce a powertrain output based at least on the first signal, the second signal and the third signal in response to the requested powertrain output.