Integrated Powertrain Controller Optimizing Shifting via Cost Function

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional powertrain control methods independently manage engines and transmissions, leading to increased complexity and difficulty in optimizing overall vehicle performance, particularly in adapting to changes in road surface inclination and driver input, resulting in suboptimal fuel efficiency and drivability.

Innovation Solution

An integrated control method and controller that determines an optimum shifting stage using a cost function based on driving distance per fuel consumption, converting driver intent into demand power, and controlling both engine throttle and transmission to optimize shifting stages, thereby enhancing fuel efficiency and drivability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If independent control of engine and transmission is used, then control simplicity is maintained, but overall vehicle performance optimization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structureVSAvoidvehicle performance optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges independent engine control and transmission control into a unified powertrain control system. The controller receives driver intent signals and vehicle state information, then simultaneously determines optimal engine output and transmission shifting decisions based on a cost function that evaluates fuel efficiency, drivability, and component constraints. This integrated approach optimizes overall vehicle performance rather than controlling each component separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple transmission maps are created for various driving states, then adaptability to different conditions is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving state adaptationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating multiple fixed transmission maps for different driving states, the patent uses a cost function with adjustable parameters (weights for fuel efficiency, drivability, and constraint satisfaction) that dynamically adapts to various conditions. The controller evaluates different shifting scenarios by computing fuel consumption, drivability metrics, and constraint violations, then selects the optimal shifting decision based on the weighted cost function, eliminating the need for pre-defined maps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If shifting is performed to suppress engine RPM for fuel efficiency, then fuel efficiency is improved, but drivability deteriorates due to frequent shifting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoiddrivability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the cost function parameters based on vehicle operating conditions. When the vehicle is in steady-state cruising conditions, the cost function heavily weights fuel efficiency to encourage higher gear selection. When acceleration demands or frequent shifting are detected, the drivability weight increases, allowing the controller to maintain lower gears and reduce shifting frequency, thus balancing fuel efficiency and drivability based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If transmission-only shifting control is used, then gear shifting optimization is achieved, but engine output consistency deteriorates requiring driver intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshifting optimizationVSAvoidengine output consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines transmission shifting control with engine output management in a unified control framework. When the controller determines an optimal shifting decision, it simultaneously adjusts engine torque requests to compensate for the changing gear ratio, maintaining consistent delivered power to the wheels. This integrated approach eliminates the need for driver intervention to maintain engine output during shifting events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10814877B2Integrated control method and integrated controller of powertrain
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10814877B2 patent drawing
  • US10814877B2 patent drawing
  • US10814877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated controller of a powertrain of a vehicle and a control method thereof, to determine an optimum shifting stage of the vehicle, may include a cost function having a driving distance per fuel consumption amount obtained through the simulation of a vehicle model by use of the demand power of the engine as an input value, wherein an optimum shifting stage is determined using the cost function to control an engine throttle in addition to controlling a transmission based on the optimum shifting stage.