Well-Tempered Meta-dynamics for PPARγ Agonist Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods, such as conventional molecular dynamics simulation, struggle to distinguish between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) full agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists due to limited sampling efficiency and inability to cross higher free energy barriers, leading to inefficient prediction of compound activities, especially for compounds with diverse structures.

Innovation Solution

The use of Well-Tempered Meta-dynamic molecular dynamics simulation to obtain free energy surfaces of PPARγ binding with full agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists, allowing for qualitative differentiation of PPARγ activity by identifying distinct conformational states, thereby reducing the need for extensive laboratory testing and resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional molecular dynamics simulation is used to simulate PPARγ conformational changes, then the simulation can be performed with standard computational resources, but the sampling efficiency is limited and cannot cross higher free energy barriers, making it difficult to distinguish between full agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to distinguish PPARγ activityVSAvoidsimulation method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies Well-Tempered Meta-dynamics simulation which modifies the potential energy surface by introducing a time-dependent bias potential that gradually lowers free energy barriers. This parameter change in the simulation methodology enables the system to cross higher free energy barriers and sample rare conformational transitions that conventional molecular dynamics cannot achieve, thereby improving the ability to distinguish between full agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic simulation approaches where the simulation parameters themselves evolve over time. The Well-Tempered Meta-dynamics method dynamically adjusts the bias potential strength during the simulation, allowing the system to progressively explore higher energy states and transition between conformational states that would be inaccessible in static or conventional dynamic simulations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If conventional QSAR prediction method is used, then the prediction can be applied to compounds with similar structures, but it cannot distinguish whether an unknown compound belongs to full agonist, partial agonist or antagonist, and prediction efficiency significantly declines when the number of compounds increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction efficiencyVSAvoidability to distinguish compound activity type
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary molecular dynamics simulations to generate conformational ensembles and calculate binding free energies for representative compounds before building the QSAR model. This preliminary action provides accurate reference data for training the QSAR model, enabling it to distinguish between full agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists with high precision when screening large numbers of compounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces binding free energy calculations and conformational analysis as intermediary steps between the compound structure and the final activity prediction. These intermediaries provide mechanistic insights into how compounds bind to PPARγ and induce conformational changes, enabling the QSAR model to accurately predict not just activity but also the type of activity (full agonist, partial agonist, or antagonist)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If simulation time of tens or hundreds of nanoseconds is used in conventional molecular dynamics, then the computational cost remains manageable, but the sampling efficiency is still insufficient to find the real stable structure of PPARγ

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation timeVSAvoidsampling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the simulation parameters by implementing Well-Tempered Meta-dynamics which introduces a time-dependent bias potential that accelerates sampling of rare events. This parameter change allows the simulation to effectively explore the conformational landscape and find stable structures in feasible simulation times, overcoming the limitation of conventional molecular dynamics where tens or hundreds of nanoseconds are insufficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12002551B2Method to distinguish peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma full agonist, partial agonist and antagonist with different activities and identification thereof
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 NANJING UNIV
  • US12002551B2 patent drawing
  • US12002551B2 patent drawing
  • US12002551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a method of constructing a pharmacophore to determine whether a molecule is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ full agonist, partial agonist or antagonist in terms of a binding energy or a free energy surface comprising: providing a protein receptor mimicking said peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and a corresponding ligand; docking the corresponding ligand and the protein receptor to form a docked conformation; performing at least two rounds of molecular dynamic simulation to obtain at least one trajectory and at least one free energy surface; inputting the trajectory to construct at least one pharmacophore and obtaining the binding energy of the corresponding ligand; comparing the molecule with the corresponding ligand in terms of the binding energy thereof to the protein receptor in order to determine whether the molecule is the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ full agonist, partial agonist or antagonist.