PPU Partitioning for Isolated GPU Multitenancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional GPUs struggle with efficiently utilizing resources when executing multiple CPU processes simultaneously due to unfair resource consumption and interference between processing subcontexts, leading to reduced performance and multitenancy issues.

Innovation Solution

A parallel processing unit (PPU) is partitioned into logical processors, each with exclusive use of a subset of hardware resources, allowing multiple processing contexts to execute in functional isolation, enhancing resource utilization and multitenancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple CPU processes offload processing tasks to a GPU simultaneously using processing subcontexts, then resource utilization improves, but resource fairness and isolation deteriorate due to unfair consumption and interference between subcontexts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidresource fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the GPU into multiple isolated processing contexts, each capable of executing CPU processes independently. This segmentation allows simultaneous execution of multiple CPU processes while preventing resource interference, as each context has its own isolated resource allocation. The segmentation principle directly addresses the contradiction by enabling both high resource utilization (through parallel execution) and resource fairness (through isolation boundaries).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a context isolation mechanism that acts as an intermediary between multiple CPU processes and the GPU resources. This intermediary layer manages resource allocation and prevents unfair consumption by ensuring each processing context operates independently. The mediator resolves the contradiction by enabling simultaneous access (improving productivity) while maintaining resource fairness through controlled allocation policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If processing subcontexts share GPU resources, then resource efficiency improves, but interference between contexts increases leading to performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidcontext interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the GPU into separate processing contexts that can share physical resources while maintaining logical isolation. This segmentation allows resource efficiency through shared hardware while preventing context interference through isolation mechanisms. Each processing context operates independently, eliminating the harmful interference effect while maintaining the benefits of resource sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by providing each processing context with its own isolated view of GPU resources, while the underlying physical resources remain shared. This approach allows resource efficiency at the system level while preventing interference at the context level. Each context experiences high-quality isolated execution without the harmful effects of other contexts' operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a GPU is configured for single processing context, then resource allocation is simple, but multiple CPU processes cannot execute simultaneously reducing overall performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration simplicityVSAvoidparallel processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the GPU into multiple processing contexts, each capable of independent execution. This segmentation enables simultaneous execution of multiple CPU processes while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized context management. The segmentation principle resolves the contradiction by providing parallel processing capability without proportionally increasing configuration complexity, as contexts can be managed through unified interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing processing contexts that can handle multiple CPU processes through a unified interface. Each context is multi-functional, capable of executing different types of processing tasks while maintaining isolation. This universality allows the GPU to support simultaneous multiple CPU processes without requiring separate configuration mechanisms for each, thus maintaining configuration simplicity while enabling parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250355716A1Techniques for configuring a processor to function as multiple, separate processors in a virtualized environment
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250355716A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355716A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355716A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A parallel processing unit (PPU), operating in a traditional processing environment or in a virtualized processing environment, can be divided into partitions. Each partition is configured to operate similarly to how the entire PPU operates. A given partition includes a subset of the computational and memory resources associated with the entire PPU. Software that executes on a CPU partitions the PPU for an admin user. A guest user is assigned to a partition and can perform processing tasks within that partition in isolation from any other guest users assigned to any other partitions. Because the PPU can be divided into isolated partitions, multiple CPU processes can efficiently utilize PPU resources.