Post-Quantum Cryptography Channel Migration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cryptographic systems, such as RSA and Diffie-Hellman, are vulnerable to quantum computers, which can potentially break modern public-key encryption using algorithms like Shor's and Grover's, necessitating a migration to quantum-resistant algorithms, but this migration is complex due to the sheer volume of data and complexity of systems, especially in financial and governmental sectors.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) systems that use techniques like PQC communications channel-based cryptography, hash-based cryptography, lattice-based cryptography, and zero-knowledge proof cryptography to secure data transmission, authentication, and key exchange, ensuring resistance to quantum computer attacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If quantum computers are developed, then computational power and problem-solving capability are improved, but security protocols and cryptographic systems become vulnerable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational powerVSAvoidsecurity protocol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing post-quantum cryptographic algorithms before quantum computers become widely available. The system proactively migrates from classical cryptographic protocols (RSA, ECC) to quantum-resistant algorithms, preparing security infrastructure in advance to prevent future vulnerabilities when quantum computing capabilities mature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning cryptographic systems from classical mathematical problems (integer factorization, discrete logarithms) to quantum-resistant mathematical problems (lattice-based, code-based, multivariate polynomial equations). This fundamental change in cryptographic parameters ensures security remains effective against both classical and quantum computational threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If migration to quantum-resistant algorithms is implemented, then long-term security is improved, but system complexity and migration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the migration process into distinct phases and components: key generation, key exchange, encryption, decryption, and authentication. Each cryptographic operation is implemented as a separate module using standardized post-quantum algorithms, allowing incremental deployment and testing without requiring complete system replacement at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by implementing a unified post-quantum cryptographic framework that can handle multiple security functions (authentication, encryption, key exchange) using the same quantum-resistant mathematical foundations. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity compared to maintaining separate classical and quantum-resistant systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If classical cryptographic systems are used, then ease of operation and compatibility are maintained, but vulnerability to quantum attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidquantum attack vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing post-quantum cryptographic protocols as a mediating layer between existing applications and the underlying cryptographic infrastructure. This allows classical systems to maintain their ease of operation while the intermediary PQC layer provides quantum-resistant security, enabling gradual migration without disrupting operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11824976B1Systems and methods for post-quantum cryptography communications channels
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US11824976B1 patent drawing
  • US11824976B1 patent drawing
  • US11824976B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for PQC. An example method includes transmitting a first portion of an electronic communication to a client device over a non-PQC communications channel, wherein the first portion of the electronic communication comprises a PQC request data structure. The example method further includes receiving a PQC acknowledgment data structure from the client device over the non-PQC communications channel. The example method further includes transmitting a quantum cryptographic key to the client device over a quantum communications channel and authenticating a session with the client device over the non-PQC communications channel based on the quantum cryptographic key. Subsequently, the example method includes transmitting a second portion of the electronic communication to the client device over a PQC communications channel.