PQC Hash Signatures for Legacy Documents Facing Quantum Forgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The threat of quantum computers poses a significant risk to classical encryption algorithms, potentially allowing attackers to forge or modify already signed documents, which are currently vast in number and impractical to re-sign using Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) algorithms.

Innovation Solution

Generate a hash of already signed documents using classical encryption algorithms and sign the hash with PQC algorithms to protect against quantum attacks, ensuring the integrity and authenticity of the documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If classical encryption algorithms are used to sign documents, then the signing process is efficient and widely compatible, but the signatures become vulnerable to quantum computer attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against quantum attacksVSAvoidcryptographic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The solution segments the protection mechanism into two independent layers: the original classical digital signature and a new PQC signature on the document hash. This segmentation allows each signature type to operate independently with its own strengths, avoiding the need to replace the entire cryptographic system while adding quantum-resistant protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite cryptographic system by combining classical encryption algorithms and Post-Quantum Cryptography algorithms. This composite approach leverages the efficiency and widespread compatibility of classical algorithms while incorporating the quantum-resistant properties of PQC, achieving enhanced security without complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If every already signed document is re-signed with PQC algorithms, then quantum resistance is achieved, but the time and effort required is complex and practically impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum resistanceVSAvoidre-signing time and effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential element that needs protection - the document's hash value - and applies PQC signing only to this extracted component. This avoids the need to re-sign entire documents or involve original signers, significantly reducing the time and effort required while maintaining security against quantum attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution performs preliminary hashing of the document content before applying the PQC signature. This preliminary action creates a fixed-size representation that is efficient to sign with PQC algorithms, enabling bulk processing of already signed documents without requiring access to original documents or signers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If a PQC signature is applied to the document hash instead of the original document, then quantum security is achieved with minimal effort, but the process requires hashing the signed document

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of protection applicationVSAvoidhashing and dual-signature process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a hash function as an intermediary between the original signed document and the PQC signature. This intermediary transforms the potentially large and complex signed document into a fixed-size hash value, making the PQC signing process efficient and standardized while maintaining the integrity link to the original document.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If classical encryption is used, then document signing is widely accepted and efficient, but the signatures are at risk from future quantum computing capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument signing efficiencyVSAvoidquantum attack vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by adding PQC signatures to documents before quantum computers become capable of breaking classical encryption. This proactive measure creates a defensive layer that will remain valid even after quantum computers advance, preventing future security breaches rather than responding to them after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20250373411A1Protecting already signed documents and code using classical encryption algorithms against quantum attacks
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 DIGICERT INC
  • US20250373411A1 patent drawing
  • US20250373411A1 patent drawing
  • US20250373411A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Protecting already signed documents and code using classical encryption algorithms includes obtaining a signed document where the signed document has previously been signed using a classical encryption algorithm; determining a hash of the signed document; encrypting the hash of the signed document to obtain a digital signature, wherein the encrypting utilizes a private key associated with a Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) algorithm; and attaching the digital signature to the signed document to provide a PQC signed document which is protected against quantum attacks on the classical encryption algorithm. Verification includes receiving a document that purports to be the PQC signed document; decrypting the digital signature using a public key associated with the private key to obtain the hash; determining a second hash of the document that purports to be the PQC signed document; and comparing the hash and the second hash to determine validity.