PRACH Occasion Multiplexing for Weak-Coverage Random Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing PRACH resource allocation schemes only support single PRACH transmission, lacking a method for configuring ROs for multiple PRACH transmissions, which is necessary for enhancing uplink coverage in areas with weak signal strength.

Innovation Solution

A mechanism for configuring multiple PRACH transmissions by time-domain, frequency-domain, or time-and-frequency-domain multiplexing of ROs, with specific positioning of PRACH occasions using identical or neighboring ROs mapping to SSBs, enabling consistent definition and improved detection efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single PRACH transmission scheme is used, then the device complexity is low, but the uplink coverage is insufficient in weak signal areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink coverageVSAvoidPRACH transmission scheme complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PRACH transmission is divided into multiple separate transmissions instead of a single transmission. Each PRACH transmission uses a dedicated RO (RACH Occasion), allowing the UE to transmit multiple PRACHs in sequence to improve the probability of successful reception in weak coverage areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and configures multiple ROs for PRACH transmissions based on coverage requirements. The network can flexibly adjust the number of PRACH transmissions, RO configurations, and multiplexing schemes (FDM, TDM, or both) to adapt to different coverage scenarios and signal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple PRACH transmissions are configured, then the uplink coverage is enhanced, but the resource allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess channel reception reliabilityVSAvoidRO configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The RO configuration mechanism is designed to be universal and multi-functional, supporting both single and multiple PRACH transmissions through a unified configuration framework. The same configuration parameters and procedures are used regardless of whether one or multiple PRACH transmissions are required, simplifying the overall system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses configurable parameters such as the number of PRACH transmissions, RO indices, and multiplexing types to control the behavior of multiple PRACH transmissions. By changing these parameters, the network can flexibly adjust the complexity and performance of the PRACH scheme without changing the underlying configuration mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If multiple ROs are used for multiple PRACH transmissions, then the transmission energy is improved, but the frequency and time resource utilization becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess channel transmission energyVSAvoidresource multiplexing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses both frequency and time dimensions for resource multiplexing of multiple ROs. By utilizing FDM (frequency division multiplexing) and TDM (time division multiplexing) separately or in combination, the system can distinguish multiple PRACH transmissions in different frequency resources, time resources, or both, thereby managing resource complexity through dimensional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If ROs are configured for multiple PRACH transmissions, then the detection accuracy is improved, but the signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePRACH detection accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration signaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The network configures multiple ROs using existing RRC signaling parameters and procedures. By reusing and extending current configuration parameters (such as adding RO index lists and multiplexing type indicators), the system can convey multiple RO configurations without requiring entirely new signaling mechanisms, thereby limiting the increase in signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260032733A1Physical random access channel transmitting method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 1FINITY INC
  • US20260032733A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032733A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032733A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A physical random access channel transmitting method and apparatus, the method including: a terminal equipment transmits a second number of PRACHs on a first number of valid ROs, the first number of valid ROs being time-domain multiplexed, or the first number of valid ROs being frequency-domain multiplexed, or the first number of valid ROs being time-domain and frequency-domain multiplexed, and the first number and the second number being positive integers greater than or equal to 2.