Managing Overlapping PRACH and SR Uplink Transmissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3GPP specifications for New Radio (NR) medium access control do not provide adequate state updates when PRACH and SR resources overlap, leading to additional latency as UE cannot immediately send the next SR or PRACH due to unaddressed skipped procedures.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a processor determining to skip UL transmissions for either a SR or PRACH procedure, adjusting associated parameters, and signaling this decision to the MAC to allow parallel procedures while avoiding overlapped transmissions, ensuring SR has higher priority over PRACH.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If SR and PRACH resources are overlapped in time, then UE implementation determines which to transmit, but the skipped procedure's state is not updated, causing additional latency

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE autonomy in selecting between SR and PRACHVSAvoidSR or PRACH latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the MAC layer updates the state of skipped procedures. When SR is skipped, SR_COUNTER is decremented and sr-prohibitTimer is stopped. When PRACH is skipped, the preamble transmission counter is decremented and RAR window is stopped. This feedback ensures proper state management and prevents unnecessary delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary state updates before the skipped procedure would naturally complete. By decrementing counters and stopping timers in advance when overlap is detected, the system prepares the UE to immediately resume the skipped procedure without waiting for counter expiration or timer completion, thereby reducing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If SR is skipped due to overlap, then PRACH can be transmitted, but SR_COUNTER is not decremented and sr-prohibitTimer keeps running, preventing immediate SR resumption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveProper state management of SR procedureVSAvoidSR resumption delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

When the MAC layer determines to skip SR transmission due to resource overlap with PRACH, it immediately provides feedback by decrementing SR_COUNTER by 1 and stopping the sr-prohibitTimer. This feedback mechanism ensures the SR procedure state is properly updated, allowing the UE to resume SR transmission immediately after PRACH completion without unnecessary delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If PRACH is skipped due to overlap, then SR can be transmitted, but preamble counter is not decremented and RAR window remains active, delaying next PRACH

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveProper state management of PRACH procedureVSAvoidPRACH resumption delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

When the MAC layer determines to skip PRACH transmission due to resource overlap with SR, it immediately updates the PRACH procedure state by decrementing the preamble transmission counter and stopping the RAR window timer. This feedback ensures proper state management, allowing the UE to resume PRACH transmission immediately after SR completion without waiting for counter expiration or window completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If UE implements autonomous selection between SR and PRACH, then flexibility is improved, but additional latency occurs due to unupdated skipped procedure states

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE flexibility in handling overlapping resourcesVSAvoidAdditional SR or PRACH latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains UE autonomy in selecting which procedure to transmit while adding MAC layer feedback mechanisms. When a procedure is skipped, the MAC layer immediately updates its state (decrementing counters, stopping timers) and notifies the PHY layer. This feedback system preserves UE flexibility while eliminating the latency caused by unupdated states, as the UE can immediately resume the skipped procedure after the transmitted procedure completes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10849165B2Handling of simultaneous transmission of PRACH and other uplink channels in mobile communications
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 MEDIATEK INC
  • US10849165B2 patent drawing
  • US10849165B2 patent drawing
  • US10849165B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques and examples of handling of simultaneous transmission of physical random access channel (PRACH) and other uplink (UL) channels in mobile communications are described. An apparatus (e.g., user equipment (UE)) determines to skip an UL transmission to a wireless network for either a first procedure or a second procedure. Responsive to determining to skip transmission of the first procedure, the apparatus performs the second procedure and also adjusts one or more parameters associated with the first procedure.