PRAME-Binding TCR CDR Engineering for Safer Tumor Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing TCRs bind to cancer self-antigens with low affinity, leading to tumor immune escape, and increasing their affinity risks cross-reactivity with normal tissues, causing off-target cytotoxicity and unpredictable side effects.

Innovation Solution

Engineering antigen binding proteins with CDR variants derived from parental TCR R11P303, enhancing binding affinity and stability for the PRAME-004 peptide-MHC complex, reducing aggregation and improving solubility for large-scale production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If TCR affinity for cancer self-antigens is increased, then tumor recognition and cytotoxicity are improved, but cross-reactivity with normal tissues increases causing off-target cytotoxicity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor recognition accuracyVSAvoidoff-target cytotoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making specific modifications only to the CDR regions (complementarity determining regions) of the TCR while keeping the framework regions unchanged. This allows targeted enhancement of antigen-binding affinity and specificity in the local binding interface without altering the overall TCR structure, thereby improving tumor recognition while maintaining safety through precise local optimization rather than global changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying amino acid sequences in the CDR regions to optimize binding parameters. Through iterative engineering of CDR sequences, the patent achieves enhanced affinity for cancer self-antigens while carefully controlling the balance between tumor recognition and cross-reactivity, demonstrating parameter optimization to resolve the contradiction between reliability and harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If TCR affinity for cancer self-antigens is increased, then immune response effectiveness is improved, but unpredictable side effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response effectivenessVSAvoidsafety predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting extensive in vitro characterization and affinity maturation of CDR variants before in vivo application. The systematic engineering and testing of CDR sequences in controlled environments allows prediction and mitigation of potential side effects before clinical use, thereby improving safety predictability while maintaining immune response effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms through iterative characterization of TCR variants, measuring binding affinities, specificity, and functional responses. This feedback loop allows optimization of CDR sequences to achieve the desired balance between productivity (immune effectiveness) and reliability (safety predictability) by learning from experimental results and refining the TCR design accordingly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If CDR regions are engineered for higher affinity, then binding stability is improved, but aggregation increases and solubility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantigen-binding stabilityVSAvoidproduction feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing stabilizing mutations specifically in the CDR regions and adjacent framework regions that are involved in antigen binding. These localized modifications enhance binding stability without causing widespread structural changes that would lead to aggregation, thereby maintaining production feasibility while improving antigen-binding stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically optimizing amino acid sequences in the CDR and framework regions to achieve the right balance between binding stability and solubility. Through controlled sequence engineering and characterization, the patent identifies mutations that improve stability parameters without crossing the threshold into aggregation-prone regimes, ensuring manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12570760B2Antigen binding proteins specifically binding PRAME
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 IMMATICS BIOTECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US12570760B2 patent drawing
  • US12570760B2 patent drawing
  • US12570760B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention concerns antigen binding proteins directed against PRAME protein-derived antigens. The invention in particular provides antigen binding proteins which are specific for the tumor expressed antigen PRAME, wherein the tumor antigen comprises or consists of SEQ ID NO: 50 and is in a complex with a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein. The antigen binding proteins of the invention contain, in particular, the complementary determining regions (CDRs) of novel engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) that specifically bind to said PRAME peptide. The antigen binding proteins of the invention are for use in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of PRAME expressing cancerous diseases. Further provided are nucleic acids encoding the antigen binding proteins of the invention, vectors comprising said nucleic acids, recombinant cells expressing the antigen binding proteins and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the antigen binding proteins of the invention.