Pre-Chamber Spark Plug Flame Kernel Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spark plugs face challenges in achieving repeatable and controllable ignition delay time and longevity when operating with lean fuel mixtures in internal combustion engines, leading to issues like misfires, incomplete combustion, and premature wear due to high combustion temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A pre-chamber spark plug design featuring a tubular velocity control tube, precise gap creation using electron beam or water jet methods, and a ground electrode configuration that directs airflow to enhance flame kernel development and ignition delay, along with the use of precious metals for increased durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional spark plugs are used to ignite lean fuel mixtures, then the engine can operate with excess air, but combustion becomes poor leading to misfires and incomplete combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion reliabilityVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pre-chamber spark plug divides the combustion chamber into two distinct regions: a pre-chamber where ignition occurs and a main chamber where the bulk combustion takes place. This segmentation allows the spark to ignite a small portion of the mixture first, creating flame kernels that then propagate into the main chamber, thereby improving combustion reliability in lean mixtures while maintaining fuel economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-chamber performs preliminary combustion action by igniting a small portion of the air-fuel mixture before the main chamber combustion. This preliminary ignition creates hot flame kernels that are then ejected into the main chamber to initiate and sustain combustion throughout the entire charge, ensuring reliable ignition even under lean operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If high energy spark is used to improve combustion of lean fuel mixtures, then ignition reliability improves, but spark plug life decreases due to premature wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidspark plug life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the combustion process into pre-chamber and main chamber phases, the spark plug concentrates its energy in a small pre-chamber volume rather than attempting to ignite the entire large combustion chamber directly. This reduces the energy demand on the spark and minimizes thermal stress on the spark plug electrodes, extending their service life while maintaining ignition reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The preliminary ignition in the pre-chamber creates a controlled, localized combustion event that generates hot flame kernels. These kernels then propagate into the main chamber, distributing the combustion energy throughout the engine cylinder without requiring the spark plug to sustain high energy output throughout the entire combustion process, thereby reducing wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If pre-chamber spark plugs are used to enhance lean flammability, then combustion performance improves, but manufacturing variations and assembly tolerances lead to poor repeatability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion performanceVSAvoidperformance repeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pre-chamber design segments the ignition system into modular components (pre-chamber assembly, main chamber interface, electrode assembly) that can be manufactured and tested independently. This modular segmentation allows for tighter control of critical dimensions in each module and simplifies quality control, improving performance repeatability despite manufacturing variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs specific geometric parameters in the pre-chamber design (such as the dome shape, hole orientations, and gap dimensions) that are optimized to provide robust combustion performance across a range of manufacturing tolerances. These parameter choices make the system less sensitive to minor variations in manufacturing and assembly, thereby improving repeatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If burn rate in pre-chamber is increased to improve flame jet penetration, then combustion speed increases, but coefficient of variation and misfire increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion speedVSAvoidcombustion consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pre-chamber design incorporates local quality variations through strategically placed holes with specific orientations and sizes in the dome structure. These localized features control the flow and distribution of the flame kernel as it exits the pre-chamber, ensuring consistent flame jet penetration and burn rates that reduce coefficient of variation while maintaining high combustion speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pre-chamber performs preliminary combustion at a controlled rate, creating multiple small flame kernels that are then ejected into the main chamber. This preliminary action at a moderate, controlled burn rate ensures consistent flame kernel formation and distribution, reducing cycle-to-cycle variation while still achieving fast overall combustion through the multiplicity of flame kernels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves repeatable and efficient combustion with lower coefficient of variation, longer spark plug life, and improved fuel efficiency by controlling flame jet velocity and penetration, reducing the impact of manufacturing variations and high combustion temperatures.

Implementation Method 1

precise gap creation using electron beam or water jet methods

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

combustion in an internal combustion engine is facilitated. An air/fuel mixture is ignited in a pre-chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

ignition produces a flame kernel that is transported to a back chamber of the pre-chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame propagation: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS9893497B2Controlled spark ignited flame kernel flow
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 WOODWARD INC
  • US9893497B2 patent drawing
  • US9893497B2 patent drawing
  • US9893497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, a spark plug includes a spark gap in an enclosure of the spark plug. The spark plug includes a passage in the interior of the enclosure. During operation of the engine, the passage directs flow through the spark gap, primarily away from a combustion chamber end of the enclosure. The passage can direct flow at a velocity of 5 meters/second or greater.