Repeated Preamble Code Detection for Carrier Offset Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication protocols face challenges in accurately detecting preamble codes within received packets to compensate for carrier frequency offset, leading to inefficiencies in processing and data detection.

Innovation Solution

The system employs differential computation logic, preamble matching logic, cross correlation averaging logic, and peak detection logic to calculate and identify the time domain position of preamble codes, enabling precise carrier frequency offset estimation and compensation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional preamble detection methods are used, then the detection process is simpler, but the detection accuracy and reliability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreamble detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The preamble detection process is segmented into multiple independent stages: differential computation stage, cross-correlation stage, peak detection stage, and validation stage. Each stage processes specific aspects of the signal independently, allowing for optimized processing at each step while maintaining overall detection accuracy through the cumulative effect of these segmented operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary differential computation on the received signal before cross-correlation, pre-processing the signal to remove carrier frequency offset effects. This preliminary action simplifies the subsequent cross-correlation operation and improves detection accuracy by eliminating a major source of error before the main detection process begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple processing stages are applied to improve detection accuracy, then the reliability of preamble detection improves, but the processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreamble detection reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation logic uses the detected peak positions and characteristics to automatically verify whether they meet expected preamble patterns. The system self-validates its own detections by checking whether the detected peaks correspond to valid preamble structures, eliminating the need for external verification and reducing overall processing time while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The peak detection stage provides feedback to the cross-correlation stage by identifying valid peak positions, which then inform subsequent processing decisions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt its processing based on detected signal characteristics, improving reliability by confirming detections while optimizing processing time by avoiding unnecessary computations on invalid signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If differential computation and cross-correlation are performed, then carrier frequency offset estimation accuracy improves, but the computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier frequency offset estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The method extracts and removes the carrier frequency offset effect through differential computation before performing cross-correlation. By taking out this interfering element in advance, the subsequent cross-correlation operation can focus solely on detecting the preamble pattern, improving estimation accuracy while reducing the computational complexity of the main detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs differential computation on only the necessary portion of the received signal corresponding to the expected preamble location and duration. Rather than processing the entire received signal, the method applies computational operations selectively to the relevant time window, reducing overall computational power consumption while maintaining accurate carrier frequency offset estimation for the preamble region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8559569B1Preamble detection based on repeated preamble codes
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 NXP USA INC
  • US8559569B1 patent drawing
  • US8559569B1 patent drawing
  • US8559569B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments associated with preamble detection based on repeated preamble codes are described. According to one embodiment, an apparatus is provided that wirelessly receives a signal and calculates a differential output corresponding to a multiplication of the signal and a delayed version of the signal. A cross correlation is performed between the differential output and a known preamble pattern to produce a cross correlation output. A moving average calculation is performed on the cross correlation output to produce an average cross correlation. One or more peaks are detected in the average cross correlation when the average cross correlation has an amplitude greater than a threshold. When the one or more detected peaks meets predetermined criteria, the apparatus provides information about at least one of the detected peaks for subsequent signal processing.